2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negligible-cost microfluidic device fabrication using 3D-printed interconnecting channel scaffolds

Abstract: This paper reports a novel, negligible-cost and open-source process for the rapid prototyping of complex microfluidic devices in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) using 3D-printed interconnecting microchannel scaffolds. These single-extrusion scaffolds are designed with interconnecting ends and used to quickly configure complex microfluidic systems before being embedded in PDMS to produce an imprint of the microfluidic configuration. The scaffolds are printed using common Material Extrusion (MEX) 3D printers and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the field of bioprinting requires greater attention to the accessory hardware necessary for cell seeding and confined, sterile flow. Fortunately, the adoption of open source hardware is well underway, especially within the field of microfluidics (Kong et al, 2017;Walsh et al, 2017;Stephenson et al, 2018;Gao et al, 2020;Felton, Hughes and Diaz-Gaxiola, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the field of bioprinting requires greater attention to the accessory hardware necessary for cell seeding and confined, sterile flow. Fortunately, the adoption of open source hardware is well underway, especially within the field of microfluidics (Kong et al, 2017;Walsh et al, 2017;Stephenson et al, 2018;Gao et al, 2020;Felton, Hughes and Diaz-Gaxiola, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, along with difficulties in the scalability of soft lithography, as the common method to fabricate PDMS‐based microfluidics, 17,18 impeded their production by the major producers in the market 14,19 . Recently, Felton et al 20 . proposed a cost‐effective and scalable 3D‐printing based technique for the production of PDMS‐based devices.…”
Section: Assured: a Closer Lookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concept is illustrated in Figure 3. As a circumvention and investigation of low-cost fabrication, Felton et al 41 suggest only printing the relief channel features, then bonding these to a glass slide to form a master template. However, this approach is still best suited for millifluidic scale devices.…”
Section: Surface Finishing For Devices Directly Cast From 3d Printed Mouldsmentioning
confidence: 99%