2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06796.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negligence litigation and medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been recent discussion in this Journal about the harms and benefits of negligence cases and whether or not a court of law is the right place to test scientific evidence [4][5][6][7][8]. I would argue strongly that negligence claims should remain within the civil courts' jurisdiction.…”
Section: The Test For Negligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been recent discussion in this Journal about the harms and benefits of negligence cases and whether or not a court of law is the right place to test scientific evidence [4][5][6][7][8]. I would argue strongly that negligence claims should remain within the civil courts' jurisdiction.…”
Section: The Test For Negligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been recent discussion in this Journal about the harms and benefits of negligence cases and whether or not a court of law is the right place to test scientific evidence [4–8]. I would argue strongly that negligence claims should remain within the civil courts’ jurisdiction.…”
Section: The Test For Negligencementioning
confidence: 99%