1989
DOI: 10.2307/1467406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neglected Predators: Water Mites (Acari:Parasitengona:Hydrachnellae) in Freshwater Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unionicola crassipes females were found in February and August in basin IV at 7 m and in basin I at 5 m respectively ; densities varied between 8 to 25 ind/m 2 . This species is normally found more frequently in pelagic samples, due to its long extremities and its swimming ability, which allows it to prey on planktonic copepoda and cladocera populations ; but adults can also prey on benthonic ephemeroptera and chironomid larvae (Proctor & Pritchard 1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unionicola crassipes females were found in February and August in basin IV at 7 m and in basin I at 5 m respectively ; densities varied between 8 to 25 ind/m 2 . This species is normally found more frequently in pelagic samples, due to its long extremities and its swimming ability, which allows it to prey on planktonic copepoda and cladocera populations ; but adults can also prey on benthonic ephemeroptera and chironomid larvae (Proctor & Pritchard 1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 3, a good relationship between water mites and their potential hosts and preys is shown. The three main species present in the mud substrates in lake Banyoles, (N. deltoides, U. crassipes and A. sinuator) eat Copepoda, Cladocera, Nematoda, Ephemeroptera and, specially the former one, Chironomidae (Mitchell 1964, Proctor & Pritchard 1989. Also, Chironomids are one of the main host of this water mite species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four taxa designated to this group (Gomphidae, Macromiidae, Hydracarina, and Leptoceridae) are relatively mobile species; however, there is no experimental evidence in the literature to suggest that a change of , 10 cm in mean water level would preferentially benefit the survival of these taxa. One possibility is that mid water levels concentrate detrital matter in rocky littoral habitats, augmenting the proportionally dominant Chironomidae taxon (Table 3) and resulting in increased forage efficiency, and thus survival, of predators such as Hydracarina (Proctor and Pritchard 1989) and Odonata (Merritt et al 2008). However, at extremely low water levels it is possible that disturbance is great enough that detrital matter is severely agitated so that no taxon exhibits a preference strong enough to be statistically designated to the low waterlevel group (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, their main predators are fish, waterfowl, amphibians, insect larvae (notably dragonfly and damselfly), backswimmers, and water mites (Lowndes, 1930;Proctor, 1964;Lilly et al, 1978;Vinyard, 1979;Allen and Wootton, 1984;Proctor and Pritchard, 1989;Griffiths et al, 1993;Uiblein et al, 1994;Lopez et al, 2002;Blanco et al, 2004;Ghioca-Robrecht and Smith, 2008;Brochet et al, 2010;Vandekerhove et al, 2012), all common in rice field ecosystems. The hard, calcified carapace of ostracods can reduce predation considerably in some cases.…”
Section: Predatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%