2012
DOI: 10.1097/bpb.0b013e32834adb36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neglected, developmental hip dislocation treated with external iliofemoral distraction, open reduction, and pelvic osteotomy

Abstract: Between 1995 and 2003, we operated upon 18 children with 20 hips involved, aged 5-11 years (average: 7.5 years) suffering from an inveterate high developmental dislocation of the hip joint. An average follow-up period of our middle-term study was 51 months (range: 34-96 months). A two-staged management was applied. First, femoral head was lowered back to the level of acetabulum with an external fixator or a distractor device. The second stage involved open reduction combined with pelvic osteotomy and, in four … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past, femoral shortening was considered only for patients who did not respond to prolonged preoperative traction [ 6 ]. An alternative to skeletal traction is an external distractor, which Wojciechowski et al used to lower the femoral head before open reduction and acetabuloplasty [ 7 ]. This method, however, entails two-stage surgery and carries the additional risk of pin site infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, femoral shortening was considered only for patients who did not respond to prolonged preoperative traction [ 6 ]. An alternative to skeletal traction is an external distractor, which Wojciechowski et al used to lower the femoral head before open reduction and acetabuloplasty [ 7 ]. This method, however, entails two-stage surgery and carries the additional risk of pin site infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, extending its use to pediatric patients is not suggested. The efficacy rates are below 50%, and its benefits do not exceed the complications, including long hospital stays, difficult postoperative care, and complex joint repositioning due to pelvic instability [6,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method of choice, arthrodiastasis, has been used since 1979 to perform joint distraction by external fixation with monolateral or Ilizarov-type devices to treat multiple conditions, including femoral neck fractures, osteoarthritis, sequelae of Perthes disease, epiphysiolysis, or chondrolysis [6,8,[24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations