2021
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/x9e7u
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negativity Spreads More than Positivity on Twitter after both Positive and Negative Political Situations

Abstract: What type of emotional language spreads further in political discourses on social media? Previous research has focused on situations that primarily elicited negative emotions, showing that negative language tended to spread further. The current project addressed the gap introduced when looking only at negative situations by comparing the spread of emotional language in response to both predominantly positive and negative political situations. In Study 1, we examined the spread of emotional language among tweet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with previous research that found a bias toward negative sentiments in recall in transmission chain experiments (Bebbington et al, 2017), or in acceptance of information (Fessler et al, 2014). A negativity bias is consistent with a broad evolutionary logic that would advantage negative information in salience and memorability (Baumeister et al, 2001), and it has been suggested that could influence as well the diffusion of information online (Acerbi, 2019b;Bellovary et al, 2021;Melumad et al, 2021;Schöne et al, 2021). On the other side, the present experiments compared a negative narrative with a neutral one, without considering explicitly a positive condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is in agreement with previous research that found a bias toward negative sentiments in recall in transmission chain experiments (Bebbington et al, 2017), or in acceptance of information (Fessler et al, 2014). A negativity bias is consistent with a broad evolutionary logic that would advantage negative information in salience and memorability (Baumeister et al, 2001), and it has been suggested that could influence as well the diffusion of information online (Acerbi, 2019b;Bellovary et al, 2021;Melumad et al, 2021;Schöne et al, 2021). On the other side, the present experiments compared a negative narrative with a neutral one, without considering explicitly a positive condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Recent work has examined affect's role in driving online engagement in both positive and negative contexts (Schöne, Parkinson, & Goldenberg, 2021). This research indicates that in response to both positive and negative political events, negativity leads to greater engagement on Twitter.…”
Section: Expression and Engagement With Affective Content On Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A main outcome of the analysis was that negative content was preponderant in online misinformation, about five times more common than positive one. The advantage of negative content has been also detected in social media, with an analysis of a large dataset from Twitter, showing that negative tweets were more likely to be retweeted after political events, both negative and positive (Schöne et al, 2021). Similar results were found considering tweets from news organisations: negative affect was expressed more than positive, and predicted more engagement (Bellovary et al, 2021).…”
Section: The Spread Of Information Onlinementioning
confidence: 60%