2020
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.4_suppl.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative impact of cachexia during chemotherapy on survival as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Abstract: 126 Background: Sarcopenia and muscle loss during chemotherapy (Cx) have a poor prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). It is unclear whether cachexia during Cx has a survival impact. Methods: mCRC patients (pts) receiving first-line Cx at a single institution between Jan 2010 and Jun 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Pts receiving doublet Cx with bevacizumab or anti-EGFR agents, ECOG Performance Status (PS) 0–2, and abdominal computed tomography (CT) before and after initiating first-line Cx at … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cachexia, for example, which is correlated with poor response and survival, leads to higher inflammation, reduced CYP-activity and loss of body mass, thereby changing the body distribution of osimertinib and its C min,SS . 51,52 While in a limited number of patients, Boosman et al found no obvious effect of sarcopenia on the association between osimertinib effectiveness outcomes and its C min,SS . 30 The potential impact of cachexia on the effectiveness of osimertinib has not been evaluated extensively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cachexia, for example, which is correlated with poor response and survival, leads to higher inflammation, reduced CYP-activity and loss of body mass, thereby changing the body distribution of osimertinib and its C min,SS . 51,52 While in a limited number of patients, Boosman et al found no obvious effect of sarcopenia on the association between osimertinib effectiveness outcomes and its C min,SS . 30 The potential impact of cachexia on the effectiveness of osimertinib has not been evaluated extensively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, other factors that could not be included in our analyses, may contribute to the lower survival seen in patients with a high osimertinib C min,SS . Cachexia, for example, which is correlated with poor response and survival, leads to higher inflammation, reduced CYP‐activity and loss of body mass, thereby changing the body distribution of osimertinib and its C min,SS 51,52 . While in a limited number of patients, Boosman et al found no obvious effect of sarcopenia on the association between osimertinib effectiveness outcomes and its C min,SS 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cachexia occurs in approximately 80% of patients with advanced cancer (Dewys et al 1980; Argilés et al 2014) and accounts for approximately 30% of cancer-related deaths (Tisdale 2003;Acharyya et al 2005;Fearon 2008;Tisdale 2009;Farkas et al 2013). Furthermore, up to 80% of patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) develop cachexia (Namikawa et al 2022), as do 37-50.4% of patients with unresectable colorectal cancer (CRC) (Nozawa et al 2020;Blum et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%