Negative impact of a health insurer-mandated de-simplification from a single-tablet regimen to a two-tablet regimen

Abstract

Objectives: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) accounts for a considerable proportion of HIV care expenses. In June 2021, a Dutch healthcare insurer implemented a mandatory policy to de-simplify branded RPV/TDF/FTC (Eviplera®) into a two-tablet regimen containing rilpivirine (Edurant®) plus generic TDF/FTC as part of cost-saving measures. The objectives of this study were to evaluate (1) the acceptance of this policy, (2) the trends in antiretroviral therapy dispensation, and (3) cost developments. Design: A retrospective database study. Methods: In this study, medication dispensation data were obtained from the Dutch Foundation for Pharmaceutical Statistics (SFK). This database covers 98% of all medication dispensations from Dutch pharmacies including people with HIV who receive ART. We received pseudonymized data exclusively from individuals insured by the insurer for the years 2020–2022. Costs were calculated using Dutch drug prices for each year. Results: In June 2021, 128 people with HIV were on branded RPV/TDF/FTC. Following the policy implementation, 59 (46%) had switched to RPV + generic TDF/FTC, but after 1.5 years, only 17/128 individuals (13%) used the proposed two-tablet regimen. The other 111/128 used RPV/TDF/FTC with prescriptions for ’medical necessity’ (n = 29), switched to RPV/TAF/FTC (n = 51), or other ART (n = 31). Despite expectations of cost-savings, costs increased from €72,988 in May 2021 to €75,649 in May 2022. Conclusions: A mandatory switch from an STR to a TTR in people with HIV proved unsuccessful, marked by low acceptance, and increased costs after one year. This underscores the necessity of incorporating patient and prescriber involvement in changing medication policies.