2020
DOI: 10.1111/een.12865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative effects of urbanisation on the physical condition of an endemic dung beetle from a neotropical hotspot

Abstract: 1. Urbanisation causes important losses in biodiversity and ecosystem of animals. To test whether these negative effects are preceded by unhealthy individuals in urban populations, we evaluated the effects of urbanisation on the abundance and physical condition of the dung beetle Dichotomius guaribensis, an endemic species of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.2. We sampled beetles in nine forest fragments with different urbanisation degrees, embedded in the urban matrix of the city of João Pessoa. Besides testing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sex and age shape dung beetle responses to biotic and abiotic conditions (e.g. Salomão et al ., 2020, 2021), as with food choice, suggesting a scenario in which it is crucial to understand how populations respond to environmental conditions. Moreover, due to the current changes of quality and quantity of food in the Anthropocene (Birnie‐Gauvin et al ., 2017; Kehoe et al ., 2020) it is critical to understand how individuals respond and species persist in different scenarios of food availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sex and age shape dung beetle responses to biotic and abiotic conditions (e.g. Salomão et al ., 2020, 2021), as with food choice, suggesting a scenario in which it is crucial to understand how populations respond to environmental conditions. Moreover, due to the current changes of quality and quantity of food in the Anthropocene (Birnie‐Gauvin et al ., 2017; Kehoe et al ., 2020) it is critical to understand how individuals respond and species persist in different scenarios of food availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although dung beetle assemblages from Atlantic Forest are diverse, many of its species have a relatively low abundance or are attracted exclusively to human feces or carrion (e.g. Canthon nigripennis Lansberge and Coprophanaeus acrisius Olsoufieff, see Iannuzzi et al ., 2016; Salomão et al ., 2020), thus using other species was an unfeasible option.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We measured physiological condition and body traits in 30 individuals per sex (female and male) in each habitat type (totaling 120 studied individuals). Although there is not an ideal number proposed for studies of body physiological conditions in dung beetles, previous studies in tropical ecosystems used 30–40 individuals per treatment (e.g., França, Barlow, et al., 2016; França, Louzada, et al., 2016; Salomão et al., 2020). A sampling effort of n = 60 is the minimum threshold recommended for ensuring an accurate estimation of dung beetle mean trait values (Griffiths et al., 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most ecological studies assess the effect of environmental quality and anthropogenic landscapes on dung beetle assemblages, presenting a trend of decreases of diversity in less conserved sites (Halffter & Favila, 1993; López‐Bedoya et al., 2022; Nichols et al., 2007). However, few studies have analyzed dung beetle physiology, demonstrating a general negative response in individuals' physiological conditions when subjected to environmental disturbances in tropical forests, such as selective logging (França, Barlow, et al., 2016), fragmentation (Salomão et al., 2018), and urbanization (Salomão et al., 2020). To the date, these studies are exclusively focused on tropical rainforests, and no study evaluated how the land use changes affect the dung beetles' physiological condition in other tropical ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%