2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf03392064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative effects of positive reinforcement

Abstract: Procedures classified as positive reinforcement are generally regarded as more desirable than those classified as aversive-those that involve negative reinforcement or punishment. This is a crude test of the desirability of a procedure to change or maintain behavior. The problems can be identified on the basis of theory, experimental analysis, and consideration of practical cases. Theoretically, the distinction between positive and negative reinforcement has proven difficult (some would say the distinction is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
96
1
45

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(17 reference statements)
11
96
1
45
Order By: Relevance
“…We should note, however, that even reinforcement-based approaches also contain elements of aversive control. Perone (2003) suggested that positive reinforcement Bmay also be regarded as an escape from relatively aversive conditions^(p. 7). He describes a study conducted by Jwaideh and Mulvaney (1976) and work from his own lab (e.g., Perone and Courtney 1992) in which stimuli associated with schedules of positive reinforcement (here, the contingent delivery of food) suppressed responding.…”
Section: Behavior Analysis and Moralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should note, however, that even reinforcement-based approaches also contain elements of aversive control. Perone (2003) suggested that positive reinforcement Bmay also be regarded as an escape from relatively aversive conditions^(p. 7). He describes a study conducted by Jwaideh and Mulvaney (1976) and work from his own lab (e.g., Perone and Courtney 1992) in which stimuli associated with schedules of positive reinforcement (here, the contingent delivery of food) suppressed responding.…”
Section: Behavior Analysis and Moralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was demonstrated that the lean "task" was not the cause of this "noncompliance" because transitions from lean-to-lean did not produce long pauses. The rich-to-lean transition was shown to be aversive because animals will emit escape responses that place them in time-out in response to signaled transitions predominantly in the rich-tolean transition compared to transitions from lean to rich conditions or between two rich and two lean conditions (Everly et al 2014;Perone 2003). Individuals with IDD and histories of self-injury also were more likely to self-injure during richto-lean transitions in a laboratory setting (DeLeon et al 2005).…”
Section: Understanding the Discrepant Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segundo Perone (2003), um estímulo aversivo é definido por sua função sobre a resposta, de modo que tal função não pode ser atribuída à estrutura do estímulo, nem ser tida como inerente a ele. A função, por sua vez, depende do contexto ambiental no qual o estímulo é apresentado.…”
Section: Fase De Tratamento: Estimulação Aversivaunclassified