2016
DOI: 10.3161/00016454ao2016.51.2.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative Effects of High Temperatures During Development on Immediate Post-Fledging Survival in Great TitsParus major

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) Our experimental temperature manipulation was rather small, which could have either been compensated by maternal brooding (though brooding did not seem to differ among the groups) or simply too small to induce measurable changes in growth. In previous studies, ca 5 ºC elevation led to a decrease in body mass in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus, 33) and great tits (Parus major, 41,42) and an increase in body mass in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor, 43); (iii) If maternal hormone transfer varies according to environmental context, our egg injection treatment might have resulted in different doses depending on the initial yolk hormone levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…(ii) Our experimental temperature manipulation was rather small, which could have either been compensated by maternal brooding (though brooding did not seem to differ among the groups) or simply too small to induce measurable changes in growth. In previous studies, ca 5 ºC elevation led to a decrease in body mass in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus, 33) and great tits (Parus major, 41,42) and an increase in body mass in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor, 43); (iii) If maternal hormone transfer varies according to environmental context, our egg injection treatment might have resulted in different doses depending on the initial yolk hormone levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Surprisingly few studies have experimentally manipulated nest temperature after hatching, and those that have done so were all conducted at relatively high latitudes. Rodríguez and Barba (2016a,b) found that both increased and decreased nest temperature had negative effects on the growth of great tit (Parus major) nestlings in a Mediterranean habitat and that heated nestlings suffered reduced post-fledging survival (Rodríguez et al, 2016). This suggests that natural nest temperature was close to optimal for nestling development.…”
Section: Effects Of Manipulation Of Nest Temperature On Nestling Growmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) A physiological perspective on behavior: Studies addressing the constraining role of air temperature on avian reproduction would gain from increasingly incorporating thermo-physiological measurement. Because temperatureeffects on nestling development and physiology can be expected to be quadratic, with adverse effects occurring at the warm and cold end of the spectra, such measurements will provide crucial mechanistic depth to observed fitness consequences, such as why heat stress during development sometimes improve short-or long-term survival (Dawson et al, 2005;Andreasson et al, 2018) but at other times negatively affect survival (Rodríguez et al, 2016). (iv) Studies across life histories: It is conceivable that species with different life histories, e.g., slow-or fast-paces of life or resident vs. migratory behavior, will be differentially affected by temperature change.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge may be especially severe for species adapted to relatively narrow temperature ranges (Boyles et al, 2011a;Boyles et al, 2011b), such as birds in the tropic (Huey et al, 2012;Khaliq et al, 2014), and those already operating close to their upper thermal limit such as desert birds (Gerson et al, 2019). However, even birds inhabiting far less extreme, thermally variable, and generally colder habitats, may suffer the negative consequences of acute heat stress (blue tits and great tits (Andreasson et al, 2018;Nord and Nilsson, 2019;Rodriguez et al, 2016).…”
Section: Durant Et Al 2019)mentioning
confidence: 99%