2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.140751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative effect of SO2 on mercury removal over catalyst/sorbent from coal-fired flue gas and its coping strategies: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 179 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,26 To solve the issue of SO 2 poisoning on mercury removal, some feasible approaches and strategies were proposed of increasing Hg 0 affinity, suppressing SO 2 adsorption, inhibiting SO 2 oxidation, enhancing active sites, promoting sulfate decomposition, and designing the micro-or meso-pores catalyst and sorbent structure. 27 The results demonstrated that the sulfur resistance of the adsorbent is of great significance for efficient mercury removal. Hence, the development of Fe-Mn adsorbents with high anti-SO 2 poisoning and mercury adsorption ability is of great significance for achieving recyclable mercury removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13,26 To solve the issue of SO 2 poisoning on mercury removal, some feasible approaches and strategies were proposed of increasing Hg 0 affinity, suppressing SO 2 adsorption, inhibiting SO 2 oxidation, enhancing active sites, promoting sulfate decomposition, and designing the micro-or meso-pores catalyst and sorbent structure. 27 The results demonstrated that the sulfur resistance of the adsorbent is of great significance for efficient mercury removal. Hence, the development of Fe-Mn adsorbents with high anti-SO 2 poisoning and mercury adsorption ability is of great significance for achieving recyclable mercury removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, they are subject to being reduced by SO 2 which makes the adsorbent poisoned 13,26 . To solve the issue of SO 2 poisoning on mercury removal, some feasible approaches and strategies were proposed of increasing Hg 0 affinity, suppressing SO 2 adsorption, inhibiting SO 2 oxidation, enhancing active sites, promoting sulfate decomposition, and designing the micro‐ or meso‐ pores catalyst and sorbent structure 27 . The results demonstrated that the sulfur resistance of the adsorbent is of great significance for efficient mercury removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, when both SO 2 and O 2 were present in the atmosphere, the Hg 0 removal efficiency increased from 95% to 98%, indicating that the simultaneous presence of SO 2 and O 2 facilitated Hg 0 removal. This may be due to (1) SO 2 is oxidized to SO 3 by the metal oxides on the adsorbent, and the SO 3 formed on the adsorbent surface oxidizes Hg 0 to Hg 2+ ; (2) in the gas phase, SO 2 binds to O 2 and oxidizes Hg 0 to Hg 2+ ; and (3) after SO 2 adsorption on the adsorbent, the adsorption activity of the neighboring adsorption sites is increased, which enhances the efficiency of the adsorbent [25,26]. It should be noted that although mercury removal by AC was not high, the experiments were conducted with the AC dosage as low as 20 mg.…”
Section: Effect Of Temperature On Mercury Removal Performancementioning
confidence: 99%