2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.583883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative Affectivity, Authoritarianism, and Anxiety of Infection Explain Early Maladjusted Behavior During the COVID-19 Outbreak

Abstract: During the first phase of the COVID-19 outbreak, Italy experienced problems of public order and maladjusted behavior. This study assessed the role of negative affectivity, right-wing authoritarianism, and anxiety of COVID-19 infection in explaining a variety of the maladjusted behaviors (i.e., “China-phobic” discrimination, panic buying) observed with an Italian sample. Specifically, we examined the effect of Negative Affectivity and Right-Wing Authoritarianism on maladjusted behaviors, and the moderating role… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous findings regarding how RWA shape reactions to the pandemic seem mixed. Some studies have shown that RWA is related to worry about COVID-19, preventive responses to COVID-19, and support for government restrictions and lockdown ( Bochicchio et al, 2021 ; Fischer et al, 2020 ; Manson, 2020 ). In contrast, other research shows that RWA predicts lower anxiety about COVID-19 and lower knowledge of the pandemic ( Choma et al, 2021 ; Kempthorne & Terrizzi, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous findings regarding how RWA shape reactions to the pandemic seem mixed. Some studies have shown that RWA is related to worry about COVID-19, preventive responses to COVID-19, and support for government restrictions and lockdown ( Bochicchio et al, 2021 ; Fischer et al, 2020 ; Manson, 2020 ). In contrast, other research shows that RWA predicts lower anxiety about COVID-19 and lower knowledge of the pandemic ( Choma et al, 2021 ; Kempthorne & Terrizzi, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we thus contribute to the growing literature on the effect of existential threat from COVID-19 on authoritarianism [ 22 , 23 ]. Rather than examining the negative consequences of authoritarianism on society during times of normative threat such as racial prejudice and intolerance of foreigners [ 24 – 27 ], we instead explore its adaptive and protective implications during times of existential threat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, people seem to have more confidence in their governments when they perceive that the government has the ability, expertise, and technical knowledge to make the best decisions for the public interest (Gozgor, 2021). Furthermore, it was also reported that effective public communication from the social institutions, as well as clear and unambiguous behavioral indications, may reduce the maladjusted behaviors by buffering the intolerance for uncertainty (Bochicchio et al, 2021). Thus, in terms of related psychological constructs, trust in government may elicit a spontaneous sociability and, as a consequence, cooperative and altruistic behaviors in social activities (Uslaner, 2018;Zmerli & Van der Meer, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, several socio-demographic factors were considered in the current study, as some of these factors have been proved to increase or decrease the likelihood of adopting protective behaviors during pandemics (Bish & Michie, 2010 ). Specifically, older individuals (e.g., Jones & Salathé, 2009 ; Lau et al 2007 ), women (e.g., Brug et al, 2004 ; Quah & Hin-Peng, 2004 ), people with a higher level of education and socio-economic status (SES; Lau et al, 2007 ), and those who have come into direct contact with the virus (i.e., personal knowledge of people who had been infected by or had died due to Covid-19 or those who have been infected with the SARS-CoV-2; Bochicchio et al, 2021 ) are generally more likely to adopt precautionary behaviors than their counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%