The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1985
DOI: 10.3109/17453678508994355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neer arthroplasty for humeral fracture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite being the established surgical procedure for 3-and 4-part fracture patterns, the long-term results have been mixed. Whereas Neer 24,26 reported excellent outcomes for both range of motion and pain relief, numerous other studies have reported suboptimal or poor results for proximal humeral fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty, 5,11,[15][16][17]19,29,30,32 Inferior long-term outcomes in the elderly are especially noteworthy. 29 In our study of 47 patients treated with hemiarthroplasty for acute 3-and 4-part proximal humeral fractures, we found a decline in functional ability as measured with 4 measures (UCLA scale, ASES index, SST-12, and Constant shoulder test); an increase in pain and an increase in patients with arthritis, tuberosity reabsorption, and stem osteolysis; a decrease in AHD; and no improvement on physical examination tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Despite being the established surgical procedure for 3-and 4-part fracture patterns, the long-term results have been mixed. Whereas Neer 24,26 reported excellent outcomes for both range of motion and pain relief, numerous other studies have reported suboptimal or poor results for proximal humeral fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty, 5,11,[15][16][17]19,29,30,32 Inferior long-term outcomes in the elderly are especially noteworthy. 29 In our study of 47 patients treated with hemiarthroplasty for acute 3-and 4-part proximal humeral fractures, we found a decline in functional ability as measured with 4 measures (UCLA scale, ASES index, SST-12, and Constant shoulder test); an increase in pain and an increase in patients with arthritis, tuberosity reabsorption, and stem osteolysis; a decrease in AHD; and no improvement on physical examination tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There have also been many reports about this non-constrained type. Most of these reports [4,29] have shown marked pain relief at resting or during exercise and satisfactory shoulder function as a whole, but do not always satisfied with their range of motion in the shoulder [ 15,36,42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients in our study were heavy workers and/or labourers and their outcome would be disproportionate due to undue loads placed on shoulder region. Twenty nine (74.35%) of these injuries in our series were due to high-energy trauma sustained, compared to the other studies where almost 89% caused by moderate trauma and 93% following trivial trauma involving activities of daily living, thus giving a higher proportion of osteoporotic fractures around shoulder [4,15]. Our patients had a mean radiological union time of 12 weeks, as compared to 15.2 weeks (3.8 months) in studies where open reduction along with internal fixation or a combination of internal and external fixation was employed [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…The widely accepted treatment of severely comminuted intra-articular proximal humeral fractures is hemi-arthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty [6,7]. Several surgical treatment options, such as closed reduction and percutaneous fixation [8], open reduction and internal fixation with a variety of constructs [9][10][11][12][13], proximal humeral intra medullary nailing [14] and shoulder arthroplasty [15], have been used with relatively good outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%