Needs assessment for providing clinical ethics consultation services in Tehran

Abstract

Introduction: One of the most important duties of hospital ethics committees is to provide medical ethics consultation to the staff and patients. This study was conducted with the aim of the needs assessment of the staff for optimal provision of medical ethics consultation services. Materials and methods: The data collection tool was a self-administered questionnaire. Hospital managers, chief nursing officers, ward managers, and head nurses of all hospitals affiliated with Tehran and Iran University of Medical Sciences entered the study. The questionnaire together with an invitation letter was sent to the samples. In the next stage, telephone follow-up of the incomplete forms was performed by the research team. Results: A total of 448 persons participated in this study (response rate: 54.2%). The mean frequency of the need for ethics consultation in each ward was 5.2 times in the last 3 months with a median of 3. The highest needs for consultation, which were common in all wards, were observed in treatment rejection by the patient, providing necessary information to obtain informed consent and obtaining consent to high risk procedures, conflict between the decisions made by the patient and the family members, decision making for the high risk patient, request for futile or inappropriate treatments, giving bad news, and decision making for the incompetent patient. Conclusion: The prevalence of ethical issues in clinical wards is variably high. The ethical issues in the clinical setting are mainly related to respect for the patient's autonomy and competency for decision making.

Face and content validity of the macarthur competence assessment tool for the treatment of iranian patients

“…They found that the main reasons of the importance of ethical issues and ethical consultation attributed to the necessary information pertaining to informed consent, determination of patient's competence for decision-making, and decision-making for incompetent patients. [ 11 ]…”

Ethical issues in oncology practice: a qualitative study of stakeholders’ experiences and expectations

“…As there are few studies in the literature with similar aims, most of which using surveys [22][23][24], we adopted a qualitative approach, as this allowed us to deepen the participants' perspectives while also enabling some space for interpretations [25,26]. Semi-structured interviews were particularly suited for our goals, as they allow an indepth investigation, providing the opportunity to delve into the experiences and perspectives of stakeholders on clinical ethics issues [27].…”