2019
DOI: 10.1101/639377
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Needlestack: an ultra-sensitive variant caller for multi-sample next generation sequencing data

Abstract: ABSTRACTThe emergence of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized the way of reaching a genome sequence, with the promise of potentially providing a comprehensive characterization of DNA variations. Nevertheless, detecting somatic mutations is still a difficult problem, in particular when trying to identify low abundance mutations such as subclonal mutations, tumour-derived alterations in body fluids or somatic mutations from histological normal tissue. The main chal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detailed protocol for amplicon-based Ion Torrent Proton sequencing is provided in the Supplementary data. Variant calling was performed using our Needlestack algorithm based on negative binomial regression analysis and specifically designed for the detection of low-abundance mutations (https://github.com/IARC bioinfo/needlestack) [21]. A p-value for being a variant (outlier from the regression) was calculated for each sample and further transformed into q-values to account for multiple hypotheses testing (Supplementary Figure 1).…”
Section: Uromutert Assay and Mutation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed protocol for amplicon-based Ion Torrent Proton sequencing is provided in the Supplementary data. Variant calling was performed using our Needlestack algorithm based on negative binomial regression analysis and specifically designed for the detection of low-abundance mutations (https://github.com/IARC bioinfo/needlestack) [21]. A p-value for being a variant (outlier from the regression) was calculated for each sample and further transformed into q-values to account for multiple hypotheses testing (Supplementary Figure 1).…”
Section: Uromutert Assay and Mutation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be a random error and we did not determine a reason for it. Among the filtering steps, we removed variants with an allelic fraction of 10 times higher than candidate variants in 5-nt to 10-nt distance from the target candidate [ 28 ]. It could indicate that using whole coding region for genes and cancers with prevalent adjacent mutations (<10 nt), may cause some limitations, particularly among variant with too low allelic fraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of 107 ESCC cases with available data on tumor TP53 mutations, we selected 30 ESCC cases based on an in silico experiment. We used a database of TP53 variants in cfDNA of a series of patients with small-cell lung cancer to determine the error rate and proportion of false-positive detection per each genomic concordance [ 28 ]. We have added 12 further cases with more than one TP53 mutations in tumors to our selected cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation