Needles, Jabs and Jags: a qualitative exploration of barriers and facilitators to child and adult immunisation uptake among Gypsies, Travellers and Roma

Abstract

BackgroundGypsies, Travellers and Roma (referred to as Travellers) are less likely to access health services including immunisation. To improve immunisation rates, it is necessary to understand what helps and hinders individuals in these communities in taking up immunisations. This study had two aims.Investigate the views of Travellers in the UK on the barriers and facilitators to acceptability and uptake of immunisations and explore their ideas for improving immunisation uptake;Examine whether and how these responses vary across and within communities, and for different vaccines (childhood and adult). MethodsThis was a qualitative, cross-sectional interview study informed by the Social Ecological Model. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 174 Travellers from six communities: Romanian Roma, English Gypsy/Irish Travellers (Bristol), English Gypsy (York), Romanian/Slovakian Roma, Scottish Show people (Glasgow) and Irish Traveller (London). The focus was childhood and selected adult vaccines. Data were analysed using the Framework approach.ResultsCommon accounts of barriers and facilitators were identified across all six Traveller communities, similar to those documented for the general population. All Roma communities experienced additional barriers of language and being in a new country. Men and women described similar barriers and facilitators although women spoke more of discrimination and low literacy. There was broad acceptance of childhood and adult immunisation across and within communities, with current parents perceived as more positive than their elders. A minority of English-speaking Travellers worried about multiple/combined childhood vaccines, adult flu and whooping cough and described barriers to booking and attending immunisation. Cultural concerns about antenatal vaccines and HPV vaccination were most evident in the Bristol English Gypsy/Irish Traveller community. Language, literacy, discrimination, poor school attendance, poverty and housing were identified as barriers across different communities. Trustful relationships with health professionals were important and continuity of care valued.ConclusionsThe experience of many Travellers in this study, and the context through which they make health decisions, is changing. This large study identified key issues that should be considered when taking action to improve uptake of immunisations in Traveller families and reduce the persistent inequalities in coverage.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN20019630.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4178-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Special Health Care Utilization Pattern with Elevated Costs and High Risk of Premature Death Among Adults Living in Segregated Roma Settlements

“…Our observations of Roma-specific health care utilization pattern are in concordance of published results of Roma studies from European countries, which were based on self-declared Roma ethnicity assessment [24][25][26][27][28][29]. The elevated risk of premature death among Roma adults living in SRS is also consistent with the Hungarian observations of the poor health status and poor self-rated health of adults living in SRS [16,21,22].…”

Taking stock of Roma health policies in Spain: Lessons for health governance

“…The NRIS-H assessment highlights the need for strengthening the evidence-base on Roma health and promoting a systematic and equity-focused health impact assessment at local level [61]. For that to take place, the type of questions asked and the methods used to collect and analyse data need to be reconsidered [20,21,23,49]. Moreover, stakeholders need to be aware of the importance of monitoring, reporting and evaluating both capabilities and fragilities, and to embed that routine into their practices [62,63].…”

“…Nevertheless, international evidence generally points to Roma being subject to greater vulnerability for social exclusion, unemployment, poverty and a low educational level that continue to hinder their access to the social determinants of health [2,5,6,20] despite political commitment to address the problem. In its intersection with ethnicity, gender, age and migration status, limited access to the social determinants of health works to produce a gradient of vulnerability in which women, children and foreign Roma are at greater disadvantage [3,7,[23][24][25].…”

Health Providers’ Narratives on Intimate Partner Violence Against Roma Women in Spain

“…The Roma population in Europe experiences situations of social marginalization and lives in ethnic enclaves; in addition they face low education levels, high unemployment and poor living and health conditions (Fernández‐Feito, Pesquera‐Cabezas, González‐Cobo, & Prieto‐Salceda, ; Jackson et al., ; Janevic, Jankovic, & Bradley, ; La Parra Casado, Gil González, & de la Torre Esteve, ; Sándor et al., ). Discrimination toward the Roma population (estimated at 2% of the total population) existed historically and continues today; Roma people are the group that faces most resistance by Spanish society (Aisa, Larramona, & Pueyo, ; Arza Porras & Carrón Sánchez, ; Fernández Garcés, Jiménez González, & Motos Pérez, ; Magazzini & Piemontes, ).…”