2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Needles in a haystack: Detrital zircon U Pb ages and the maximum depositional age of modern global sediment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…155-150 Ma for thrusting and subsequent deformation of the Galice Formation in the Klamath Mountains (Harper et al, 1994;MacDonald et al, 2006). Based on the degree of concurrence with paleontologic ages and the high proportion of young zircon in the Galice Formation samples (i.e., Cawood, 2012;Dickinson and Gehrels, 2009b;Spencer et al, 2016;Herriott et al, 2019;Sharman and Malkowski, 2020), we suggest that our MDAs are reasonable estimates for turbidite deposition in the Galice Formation.…”
Section: Maximum Depositional Agessupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…155-150 Ma for thrusting and subsequent deformation of the Galice Formation in the Klamath Mountains (Harper et al, 1994;MacDonald et al, 2006). Based on the degree of concurrence with paleontologic ages and the high proportion of young zircon in the Galice Formation samples (i.e., Cawood, 2012;Dickinson and Gehrels, 2009b;Spencer et al, 2016;Herriott et al, 2019;Sharman and Malkowski, 2020), we suggest that our MDAs are reasonable estimates for turbidite deposition in the Galice Formation.…”
Section: Maximum Depositional Agessupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Samples from the Rattlesnake Creek terrane cover sequence do not contain a high proportion of young ages (e.g., as low as 7% total Mesozoic ages; Table 3), making MDA assessment nonideal (Dickinson and Gehrels, 2009b;Spencer et al, 2016;Andersen et al, 2019;Coutts et al, 2019;Herriott et al, 2019;Gehrels et al, 2020;Sharman and Malkowski, 2020). Nonetheless, our samples do include 38 grains younger than the previously assigned minimum age of 193 Ma (Wright and Wyld, 1994) and thus provide new constraints on the timing of deposition for por-tions of the Rattlesnake Creek terrane cover sequence.…”
Section: Maximum Depositional Agesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The reliability of the detrital zircon dating technique for sedimentary sequences will not be reviewed here, having been discussed and assessed by many others who have identified biases, methodological issues, and interpretative problems with detrital zircons (Allen & Campbell, 2012;Andersen, Elburg & Magwaza, 2019;Coutts, Matthews & Hubbard, 2019;Horstwood et al, 2016;Johnstone, Schwartz & Holm-Denoma, 2019;Klötzli et al, 2009;Košler et al, 2013;Sharman & Malkowski, 2020).…”
Section: Winton Formation Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This calculation was based on the weighted average age of the youngest clusters of multiple analyses (at least three analyses, n ⩾ 3) with overlapping in age at 2σ (statistical error in millions of years), as proposed by Dickinson and Geherels (2009). This method provides a conservative measure of the depositional age compared to the youngest single grain ages, especially for ancient samples (Dickinson andGeherels 2009, Sharman andMalkowski 2020). These calculated ages were compared with the youngest peak age population of each unit (Tab.…”
Section: Maximum Depositional Agesmentioning
confidence: 99%