Endemic 2016
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-52141-5_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Needles and Bullets: Media Theory, Medicine, and Propaganda, 1910–1940

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, as media historian Ghislain Thibault notes, the ‘hypodermic model’ of mass communication (also known as the ‘sender > message > receiver’ model) has theoretical origins in early 20th-century US military rationales for production of ‘venereal disease’ prevention propaganda films (Thibault, 2016). While this model has been contested in the broad fields of media and communication studies, many public health practitioners still seem to assume that a ‘good’ sexual health message or campaign is one that provides an authoritative signal that is a prophylactic (or antidote) to the ‘noise’ of vernacular digital sexual cultures (Albury, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, as media historian Ghislain Thibault notes, the ‘hypodermic model’ of mass communication (also known as the ‘sender > message > receiver’ model) has theoretical origins in early 20th-century US military rationales for production of ‘venereal disease’ prevention propaganda films (Thibault, 2016). While this model has been contested in the broad fields of media and communication studies, many public health practitioners still seem to assume that a ‘good’ sexual health message or campaign is one that provides an authoritative signal that is a prophylactic (or antidote) to the ‘noise’ of vernacular digital sexual cultures (Albury, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4. The most detailed and substantive engagement can be found in the dissertations of Scott Curtis and Donald Fredericksen (Curtis, 1996; Fredericksen, 1973), both of whom laid the foundations for my own research by revealing invaluable primary sources. Other noteworthy discussions of Münsterberg and the Paramount Pictographs can be found in Griffith (1970); Langdale (2002); Marcus (2007); Pelster-Wiebe (2018); Thibault (2016); Winter (2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%