2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Needle tip visualization during ultrasound-guided vascular access: short-axis vs long-axis approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
142
1
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
142
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies on short -axis view and its comparison to anatomical landmark-guided technique have not mentioned the duration of different catheterization steps. The access time was 17.72 seconds in Group 1 (SAG) in our study and 12.4 -240 seconds in other studies (1,(8)(9)(10)(11). Access time in Group 2 (M-OG) was shorter compared to Group 1, but the difference was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Most studies on short -axis view and its comparison to anatomical landmark-guided technique have not mentioned the duration of different catheterization steps. The access time was 17.72 seconds in Group 1 (SAG) in our study and 12.4 -240 seconds in other studies (1,(8)(9)(10)(11). Access time in Group 2 (M-OG) was shorter compared to Group 1, but the difference was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The in-plane puncture technique may require more training, because it implies having the skills to direct the needle exactly within the plane of the probe. Although the evidence base is not yet strong in this regard [20,[45][46][47], this expert panel believes that adequate training for ultrasound-guided central venous access should include knowledge and practice of both techniques.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be noted that the procedure can be carried out during surgery because the abducted position of the upper extremities is common in the operating room, thus further reducing the time required. This is a clear advantage over the traditional external landmark technique where the adducted position of the upper extremity is required and forces the anesthesi-ologist to cannulate the IJV in the operating setting, associated with a higher incidence of infection and thrombosis [8] [9] [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IJV is more popular due to the easier access and perceived lower risk of complications, however, subclavian vein (SCV) catheter placement is associated with a lower incidence of infection and thrombosis [8] [9] [10].…”
Section: Most Authors [1] [2] [3] [4]mentioning
confidence: 99%