1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76340-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Needle Revision With and Without 5-Fluorouracil for the Treatment of Failed Filtering Blebs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
70
0
6

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
70
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…[11][12][13] It is possible that repeated needling might have improved our results. However, repeated needling procedures without antimetabolites may stimulate fibroblastic proliferation even more, and may increase the risk of endophthalmitis, choroidal detachment, and shallow anterior chamber.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[11][12][13] It is possible that repeated needling might have improved our results. However, repeated needling procedures without antimetabolites may stimulate fibroblastic proliferation even more, and may increase the risk of endophthalmitis, choroidal detachment, and shallow anterior chamber.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors suggested that needling with adjunctive 5-FU or MMC may inhibit fibroblastic proliferation, increasing the success rates of this procedure. 12,13 BenSimon and Glovinsky 19 reported a 76% success rate of needling with MMC in 41 eyes 6 months after the procedure. Mardelli et al 16 reviewed the charts of 62 eyes with failed filtering blebs that underwent needle revision using MMC and observed that the IOP decreased from 24.176.4 mmHg before needling to 11.574.8 mmHg at the last follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations