2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.967104914.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Needle fixation, the drug user's perspective: a qualitative study

Abstract: Issues conveniently considered together as needle fixation are current among injecting drug users and may be relevant to the inability of some drug users to change from injecting drug use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here then the rush concerns the practice of injecting heroin and the object of the syringe-in-use. This embodiment of the rush therefore questions the recent conclusions of Pates et al (2001) and McBride et al (2001), particularly their argument that the syringe serves primary and secondary functions. Although anecdotal evidence and personal opinion are considered by Pates et al (2001:14) to lack empirical weight, the comments from my male respondents nonetheless question their claim that conditioning provides the most plausible explanation for understanding the phenomenon of needle fixation:…”
Section: The Rushmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Here then the rush concerns the practice of injecting heroin and the object of the syringe-in-use. This embodiment of the rush therefore questions the recent conclusions of Pates et al (2001) and McBride et al (2001), particularly their argument that the syringe serves primary and secondary functions. Although anecdotal evidence and personal opinion are considered by Pates et al (2001:14) to lack empirical weight, the comments from my male respondents nonetheless question their claim that conditioning provides the most plausible explanation for understanding the phenomenon of needle fixation:…”
Section: The Rushmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Some definitions cited by participants are similar to those offered by Pates et al (2001) and McBride et al (2001). However, there are also many instances in which our participants use the term to describe behaviours that do not fit the definition of repetitive, compulsive and continual injecting behaviour .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…14 Certains auteurs comparent, notamment mais pas seulement pour cette raison, la pratique de l'injection avec la sexualité (McBride et al, 2001 ;Howard et Borges, 1971). …”
Section: Se Shooter En Présence D'intervenants ! ?unclassified