1996
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(95)03689-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Needle, crown, stem, and root phytomass of Pinus sylvestris stands in Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
10
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…1), therefore serve as a relative measure of the economy in the investment of assimilates. The ratio of the needle biomass to the total crown biomass (40 %) was comparable to the fraction of 34 % reported by Monserud et al (1996) for Scots pine in Russia.…”
Section: Individual Tree Levelsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1), therefore serve as a relative measure of the economy in the investment of assimilates. The ratio of the needle biomass to the total crown biomass (40 %) was comparable to the fraction of 34 % reported by Monserud et al (1996) for Scots pine in Russia.…”
Section: Individual Tree Levelsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Similarly, the rate and the structure of colonization of the soil by roots affect both water and nutrient uptake. Usually, most of the roots grow in the topsoil layers, exploiting the most fertile soil horizons and acquiring rain water (Jackson et al 1996;Monserud et al 1996;Janssens et al 1999;Xiao et al 2003;Konopka et al 2005Konopka et al , 2006. However, in sites with easily accessible groundwater and low precipitation, a significant fraction of the roots grow in deeper soil layers, as, e.g., observed in Scots pine Č ermák et al 2008a) and in oak trees (Vyskot 1976;Tatarinov et al 2008), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Before shrubs were harvested, basal diameter, diameter at 10 cm, stem height, total height, and canopy cover were measured. Felled shrubs covered the entire observed range of stem diameter on the study plot (Marklund, 1983;Monserud et al, 1996). After felling, each component (leaves, stems and branches) was separated for fresh weight measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Da sich die Biomasse wie auch die Anteile der Kompartimente nicht-linear zur Baumdimension entwikkeln, werden zu ihrer Bestimmung im allgemeinen artspezifische Schätzfunktionen auf der Basis des Brusthöhendurchmessers (BHD) herangezogen, die auf Stichprobenaufnahmen einzelner Bäume basieren. Einige Funktionen dieser Art sind bereits in der Literatur vorhanden (zum Beispiel für Kiefer (FINER 1989, MONSERUD et al 1996, VANNINEN et al 1996), Fichte (BURGER 1953, DROSTE 1969, CERNY 1990, JOHANSSEN 2000, MUND et al 2002, Buche und Eiche (BURGER 1947, BURGER 1950). Bei der Anwendung verfügbarer Funktionen ergeben sich allerdings diverse Probleme.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified