2010
DOI: 10.1071/is10011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions?

Abstract: Abstract. Despite the widespread and common use of DNA-sequence data to estimate phylogenies, support or contest classifications, and identify species using barcodes, they are not commonly used as the primary or sole source of data for describing species. This is possibly due to actual or perceived pressure from peers to include morphology as the primary source of data for species descriptions. We find no compelling evidence to exclude DNA-only descriptions, or to insist that morphology always be included in a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
101
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
101
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The formal naming of species provides a means for communicating the unique properties of distinct evolutionary lineages, even if they are morphologically indistinguishable. The absence of morphological data or traits should not preclude publication of a species description with only DNA-sequence data as a diagnosis (Cook et al, 2010). The formal names introduced here link distinct COI-barcodes to type specimens, known geographic distributions and symbiont associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The formal naming of species provides a means for communicating the unique properties of distinct evolutionary lineages, even if they are morphologically indistinguishable. The absence of morphological data or traits should not preclude publication of a species description with only DNA-sequence data as a diagnosis (Cook et al, 2010). The formal names introduced here link distinct COI-barcodes to type specimens, known geographic distributions and symbiont associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The five additional species were from Western Pacific and Indian oceans. The field of taxonomy is rapidly evolving to accept 'molecular' species descriptions in the absence of other reliable characters (Cook, Edwards, Crisp, & Hardy, 2010). Many arguments have been levied against the practice of molecular species descriptions À e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular systematic and population genetic methods are crucial to unearthing cryptic taxa (Cook et al 2010), owing at least, in some taxonomic groups, to their morphological constancy. This has been recently documented among the Western Australian subterranean fauna by Bradford et al (2010) and Guzik et al (2011b).…”
Section: Fire Millipedes (Family Pachybolidae)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phylogenetic species were identified using the Population Aggregation Analysis algorithm, that involves a search for fixed differences between local populations, followed by successive rounds of aggregation of populations and previously aggregated population groups that are not distinct from each other (Davis & Nixon, 1992), and complementary analytical procedures described by Cook et al (2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%