2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Need for cognition relates to low-level visual performance in a metacontrast masking paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For some participants, performance decreases with increasing SOA; for others, performance increases (Albrecht et al, 2010). This phenomenon has been replicated multiple times in our own lab (Albrecht & Mattler, 2012a, 2012bFleischhauer, Miller, Enge, & Albrecht, 2014). as well as by others (e.g., Maksimov et al, 2011).…”
Section: Individual Differencessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For some participants, performance decreases with increasing SOA; for others, performance increases (Albrecht et al, 2010). This phenomenon has been replicated multiple times in our own lab (Albrecht & Mattler, 2012a, 2012bFleischhauer, Miller, Enge, & Albrecht, 2014). as well as by others (e.g., Maksimov et al, 2011).…”
Section: Individual Differencessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Need for cognition (NFC) can be defined as a learner's individual disposition to engage in effortful cognitive activities and to enjoy thinking and being cognitively challenged (Cacioppo and Petty 1982;Cacioppo et al 1984;Cacioppo et al 1986). High NFC is associated with thorough processing of arguments and argument quality (Cacioppo et al 1983;Cacioppo et al 1986), with thorough processing of task-relevant information (Fleischhauer et al 2014;Reinhard 2010, Exp. 1 & 2;Reinhard and Dickhäuser 2009;Verplanklen et al 1992), and thorough processing of learning materials (Sadowski and Gülgöz 1996).…”
Section: Need For Cognition and The Generation Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32]). This may become a way toward handy diagnostic and screening methods for individual vulnerability and resilience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%