2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-017-1028-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Need for a more developmental perspective: QTc prolongation under psychotropic medication

Abstract: not treated appropriately, but several authors suggest that the exact relationship between prolongation of the QTc interval and the risk of TdP remains elusive [6,7]. Nevertheless, there seems to be a broad consensus that QTc interval > 450-500 ms, and/or QTc prolongation > 60 ms should be used as thresholds requiring increased attention in clinical settings. In addition, physicians should consider cardiovascular risk factors when choosing antipsychotic medications and monitor QTc intervals depending on patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, adverse effects of dopamine receptor antagonists are broad, ranging from extrapyramidal adverse effects including acute dystonia, parkinsonism, and akathisia to metabolic adverse effects including weight gain, type 2 diabetes mellitus, lipid spectra abnormalities, blood pressure changes, fatigue, headache, body temperature dysregulation, hyperprolactinemia, and sexual dysfunction, increase of prolactin levels, and QTc-prolongation as well as ‘behavioral’ changes, such as concentration problems, apathy, anhedonia and sedation, aggression, anxiety, and agitation [ 114 , 115 ]. The limited existing evidence does not allow to predict individual potential adverse effects preceding the start of treatment [ 116 ]. Regarding hyperprolactinemia, antipsychotics with tight D2-binding predictably lead to hyperprolactinemia (“prolactin-raising”), whereas antipsychotics with loose D2-binding and partial agonistic action (e.g., aripiprazole) are considered as “prolactin-sparing” [ 117 ].…”
Section: Methodology Of Selection Of Agents and Literature Search Str...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, adverse effects of dopamine receptor antagonists are broad, ranging from extrapyramidal adverse effects including acute dystonia, parkinsonism, and akathisia to metabolic adverse effects including weight gain, type 2 diabetes mellitus, lipid spectra abnormalities, blood pressure changes, fatigue, headache, body temperature dysregulation, hyperprolactinemia, and sexual dysfunction, increase of prolactin levels, and QTc-prolongation as well as ‘behavioral’ changes, such as concentration problems, apathy, anhedonia and sedation, aggression, anxiety, and agitation [ 114 , 115 ]. The limited existing evidence does not allow to predict individual potential adverse effects preceding the start of treatment [ 116 ]. Regarding hyperprolactinemia, antipsychotics with tight D2-binding predictably lead to hyperprolactinemia (“prolactin-raising”), whereas antipsychotics with loose D2-binding and partial agonistic action (e.g., aripiprazole) are considered as “prolactin-sparing” [ 117 ].…”
Section: Methodology Of Selection Of Agents and Literature Search Str...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, questions around how to deal with treatment refractoriness remain unanswered [ 193 ]. The risk of adverse events when using specific agents needs further exploration, e.g., sudden death due to QTc prolongation [ 116 ], hyperprolactinemia and its consequences [ 109 ], and weight gain [ 128 ]. In addition, the questions of optimal treatment duration, as well as long-term outcome after discontinuation of a pharmacological treatment of tics remain unanswered.…”
Section: Current Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roessner et al . (2017) pointed out that the results of ‘non-naturalistic’ studies should be interpreted with caution because participants in safety studies are usually free of many other clinically encountered risk factors, and a baseline QTc value exceeding 450 msec is usually an exclusion criterion (Roessner et al . 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical trials have the risk of potential selection bias in cohorts with a low risk of QTc prolongation due to exclusion criteria for the baseline of QTc value. Roessner et al (2017) pointed out that the results of 'non-naturalistic' studies should be interpreted with caution because participants in safety studies are usually free of many other clinically encountered risk factors, and a baseline QTc value exceeding 450 msec is usually an exclusion criterion (Roessner et al 2017). A retrospective study tends to have more neutral cohorts without this kind of selection bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in childhood and adolescence, pathological prolonged QT interval, associated to antipsychotic treatment, is not frequently reported [117], quantity and quality of evidence are lower than in adulthood. Thus, a careful monitoring is recommended [118].…”
Section: Safety Antipsychotics In Youthmentioning
confidence: 99%