1979
DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(79)90527-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Necrotizing infection of scrotum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 37 additional cases had been reported through 1976 [16]. We have found another 15 cases added to the literature in the last 6 years [4,18]. The appearance of antibiotics was presumed to be responsible for this apparent change in incidence [ll, 16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Only 37 additional cases had been reported through 1976 [16]. We have found another 15 cases added to the literature in the last 6 years [4,18]. The appearance of antibiotics was presumed to be responsible for this apparent change in incidence [ll, 16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fournier described all of his cases as being without known precipitating causes and he postulated a septic etiology [1,2]. Previous authors have found Perforated colonic diverticula Pancreatitis approximately 50% of cases to fall into an idiopathic category [13,18,19]. Bacterial involvement is clinically evident, but proof of its being the inciting cause is lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…the occurrence of Fournier's gangrene has not been described, to our knowledge, even in large series of infections in acute leu kemia [7], In our patient a micro-organism was isolated from the lesion and from several blood cultures nearly at the same time; the Pseudomonas had the same strict antibiotic sensitivity, thus suggesting it to be the same germ. Previous work has reported a wide range of organisms isolated from the necrot ic lesion, but Pseudomonas was only an oc casional finding [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%