Forensic Taphonomy 1996
DOI: 10.1201/9781439821923.ch32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NecroSearch Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent geophysical research using simulated clandestine graves have found optimal detection methods and configurations are highly variable, depending upon a host of factors, the most important deemed to be time since burial, burial style, local soil type, vegetation and climate [35,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent geophysical research using simulated clandestine graves have found optimal detection methods and configurations are highly variable, depending upon a host of factors, the most important deemed to be time since burial, burial style, local soil type, vegetation and climate [35,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These full searches have also involved a variety of methods, including forensic geomorphology [20], forensic botany [23,24] and entomology [25,26], scent-trained search dogs [27,28], physical probing [29][30][31], thanatochemistry [32][33][34] and near-surface geophysics [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near-surface geophysical surveys have been shown to be successful at locating near-surface buried remains, albeit dominated by the Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) method [9,[14][15][16][17][18]. However, whilst generally accepted to have the highest resolution, GPR investigations may not be suitable in certain sites, for example in large survey areas or where soils have very high clay contents that rapidly attenuates radar signal that results in poor penetration depths being attained [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; remote sensing [1][2], site walk-overs [3], cadaver dogs [4], methane [5] and soil probes [6][7], near-surface geophysics, which includes metal detectors [8][9][10][11], geochemical surveys [5] and mass excavations [12]. Current UK search best practice suggests creating a conceptual target (and geological) model of the suspected burial site, using available site, case, intelligence and other information, prior to undertaking fieldwork to maximise the chances of detection (see [13]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field-based geoscientists have been employed to locate homicide victim's graves, weapons and other buried or concealed objects using a variety of techniques. The search methods include remote sensing [2][3], cadaver dogs [4], methane [5] and soil probes [6][7], near-surface geophysics, which includes metal detectors [8][9][10], geochemical surveys [5] and mass excavations [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%