2022
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.862143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Necroptosis is Related to Anti-PD-1 Treatment Response and Influences the Tumor Microenvironment in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Abstract: The latest research suggesting that necroptosis plays a vital role in immune response. However, the influence of necroptosis on tumor microenvironment (TME) remodeling and immunotherapy is still unclear. We analyzed the variations in the expression of 26 necroptosis-related molecules in HNSCC and the influence of genome changes. We investigated HNSCC samples and determined that there are two necroptosis phenotypes in HNSCC cancer, and there are significant differences in cell infiltration characteristics and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, compared to the conventional tools such as age, gender, stage and HPV status for evaluating clinical outcomes, the risk score signature worked independently of these factors and had significantly superior efficiency in predicting prognosis in training and validation cohorts. We also reviewed previous published HNSCC-related risk models which including different genes’ combination ( Liu et al, 2020 ; Li et al, 2021b ; He et al, 2021 ; Wang et al, 2022a ; Huang et al, 2022b ; Wang et al, 2022b ; Chen et al, 2022 ; Chi et al, 2022 ; Du et al, 2022 ; Han et al, 2022 ; Peng et al, 2022 ), among these, none of them presented better AUC value performance than our model. Therefore, our risk score signature could be a promising surrogate for evaluating the prognosis of HNSCC in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, compared to the conventional tools such as age, gender, stage and HPV status for evaluating clinical outcomes, the risk score signature worked independently of these factors and had significantly superior efficiency in predicting prognosis in training and validation cohorts. We also reviewed previous published HNSCC-related risk models which including different genes’ combination ( Liu et al, 2020 ; Li et al, 2021b ; He et al, 2021 ; Wang et al, 2022a ; Huang et al, 2022b ; Wang et al, 2022b ; Chen et al, 2022 ; Chi et al, 2022 ; Du et al, 2022 ; Han et al, 2022 ; Peng et al, 2022 ), among these, none of them presented better AUC value performance than our model. Therefore, our risk score signature could be a promising surrogate for evaluating the prognosis of HNSCC in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, in our cohort, FAM135B mutations occurred only in LCLC, with a 35% mutation rate, suggesting that the mutation may be specific to LCLC compared to LCNEC. It has been reported to have high mutation rates in other lung cancers such as LUSC (Xie et al, 2021) and SCLC (Hu et al, 2019;Wang et al, Frontiers in Genetics frontiersin.org 2019). Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has been shown to strongly express FAM135B with poor prognosis and silencing FAM135B increases radiosensitivity (Bi et al, 2021;Dong et al, 2021), but there is little evidence to support mutation as the underlying cause of elevated expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%