1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)90412-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Necropsy Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer and Detection-Bias in Case/Control Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study clearly shows how detection bias may have been neglected in other retrospective studies, leading to the conclusion that the magnitude of the association between estrogens and endometrial cancer has been greatly overestimated. This has been at least partially confirmed in a study based on 8998 necropsies in which undetected endometrial cancer was observed 4 to 5 times more frequently than endometrial cancer is diagnosed during life (Horwitz et al 1981). It is interesting to note that their RR of 1.7 is similar to the RR of 1.8 reported in the prospective study by Gambrell (1988).…”
Section: Endometrial Carcinomasupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This study clearly shows how detection bias may have been neglected in other retrospective studies, leading to the conclusion that the magnitude of the association between estrogens and endometrial cancer has been greatly overestimated. This has been at least partially confirmed in a study based on 8998 necropsies in which undetected endometrial cancer was observed 4 to 5 times more frequently than endometrial cancer is diagnosed during life (Horwitz et al 1981). It is interesting to note that their RR of 1.7 is similar to the RR of 1.8 reported in the prospective study by Gambrell (1988).…”
Section: Endometrial Carcinomasupporting
confidence: 72%
“…All necropsy-based studies have inherent limitations. Mortality data may give a dis torted reflection of the incidence of a disease within a community [7], and necropsy data may even give a distorted reflection of mortal ity [8]. A generalised reduction in necropsy rates in many countries has led to an in creased selectivity of patients undergoing post-mortem examination.…”
Section: Discussion and C Onclusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other retrospective analyses have also shown no difference in disease-free or overall survival between asymptomatic patients and those with PMB [8,9]. Ultimately a significant number of endometrial carcinomas may never become clinically apparent, as was shown in an autopsy study that found a 4-6 times higher incidence [6,10]. In summary, current data do not support ultrasound screening for endometrial carcinoma and further investigation of incidental endometrial thickening in the absence of PMB provides no benefit.…”
Section: Is Biopsy Indicated For Endometrial Thickening In Postmenopamentioning
confidence: 55%