2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Necking in glassy polymers: Effects of intrinsic anisotropy and structural evolution kinetics in their viscoplastic flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once this level of strain was reached, the fibrillar state had developed fully in the central part of the specimen and was characterized by a maximum (final) value of an anisotropy index. This also complies with the apt term ''orientation hardening'' as used to qualify the strain hardening of polymers by Li and Buckley (2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once this level of strain was reached, the fibrillar state had developed fully in the central part of the specimen and was characterized by a maximum (final) value of an anisotropy index. This also complies with the apt term ''orientation hardening'' as used to qualify the strain hardening of polymers by Li and Buckley (2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The initial objective of this study was to gather a wide range of experimental results that could be advantageously used in further FE simulations to test models with respect to the propagation of plastic instabilities (Li and Buckley, 2010). In benchmark problems dealing with necking, FE simulations are generally compared with global macroscopic observables (stress-strain curves, radius evolution at the necking section of a circular bar, flow stress level during the neck propagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. This strain heterogeneity with the exact same trend has been shown by numerous authors and also using FE methods, when modelling plastic deformation processes of ductile materials (Mikkelsen, 1999;Li, 2010). As a result, when the X-ray beam travels along path A, it probes a strain larger than that "measured" at this time by DIC.…”
Section: I(q) Intensity Curvessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…18, especially at large strain. It is believed that more detailed consideration of the interaction between matrix and inclusions and a more realistic anisotropic flow model could be able to achieve a better agreement [63]. (4) The structural relaxation parameters x and ß are fitted to a stress-free, constant heating profile of the thermal deformation (Fig.…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%