2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neck dissection for oral mucosal melanoma: Caution of nodular lesion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cryotherapy was initially suggested to treat superficial lesions. Prophylactic, functional, or radical neck dissection was performed for different patients [18, 19]. Post-operative chemotherapy was performed every 3 weeks for 2 cycles in CN0 patients and for 4 cycles in CLN positive patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cryotherapy was initially suggested to treat superficial lesions. Prophylactic, functional, or radical neck dissection was performed for different patients [18, 19]. Post-operative chemotherapy was performed every 3 weeks for 2 cycles in CN0 patients and for 4 cycles in CLN positive patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The macroscopic appearance of oral PMMs has been found to correlate with the risk of developing regional metastases. Based on this finding, it may be advisable for patients with clinically nodular oral melanomas to undergo prophylactic neck dissection; close follow‐up may be acceptable for patients with flattened/macular oral PMMs . Sentinel lymph node biopsy may provide an alternative to identify patients who could benefit from an elective neck dissection.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wuet al suggested that the patients with cN0 nodular melanomas should have prophylactic neck lymph node dissection, while close observation is recommended for patients with cN0 macular melanomas. The patients with metastaticcervical lymph nodes should undergo radical neck resection [18]. On the contrary, Tanaka et al [19] supported the viewpoint of Blatchford et al [20] brown, gray, purple and red.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%