1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6377(97)00022-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Necessary conditions for global stability of multiclass queueing networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hasenbein (1998) extended these results to the uid models of certain two-station queueing networks with probabilistic routing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hasenbein (1998) extended these results to the uid models of certain two-station queueing networks with probabilistic routing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In these unstable examples, the total number of jobs in the system goes to inÿnity with time. Other recent work on the stability of queueing networks and uid networks includes Harrison and Nguyen (1995), Bramson (1997Bramson ( , 1999, Bertsimas et al (1996), Dumas (1996Dumas ( , 1997, Dai and Weiss (1996), Foss and Rybko (1995), Winograd and Kumar (1996), , Chen andZhang (1997, 1998), Morrison and Kumar (1998), and Hasenbein (1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, some scholars use the queuing network method to solve the problem of cell scheduling. Hasenbein [7]and Harrison [8] treat each batch part as a work piece, and use an ordinary single-server queuing network to find the approximate solution. The queuing network method shortens the waiting time of parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that our terminology is somewhat different than that in [DaV00], and in related work [Ha97] and [DaHV99]. There, the authors employ the term "fluid networks" rather than "fluid models", and employ the term "global stability" for when the fluid networks are stable.…”
Section: Global Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This argument heavily uses the structure of V (S), which was defined with appropriate "gaps" between its classes so that service at V 1 (S) will prevent service at V 2 (S) and vice versa, because of the presence of low priority classes in between. More detail is given in [DaV00] and in [Ha97], which looks at a related problem. (The reference [DaV96] cited in [DaV00] never appeared due to an unrelated flaw in extending push starts to the queueing network setting.…”
Section: Systematic Presentation Of Virtual Stations and Push Startsmentioning
confidence: 99%