2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2009.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Necessary and sufficient conditions for stabilizability of positive LTI systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that statement (i) of Corollary 3.3 holds, but that statements (ii) and (iii) do not. More generally, for arbitrary g : R + → R + , whenever y * > 0 is such that 21) in particular meaning that the estimates in both (ii) and (iii) do not hold, then x * := (I − A) −1 Bg(y * ) is a non-zero equilibrium of (3.18) and the zero equilibrium of (3.18) cannot then be globally asymptotically or exponentially stable. The papers [49,64] consider attractivity and stability properties of the non-zero equilibrium x * when m = p = 1 and under conditions on A, B, C and g which ensure that y * > 0 in (3.21) is unique.…”
Section: Lur'e Difference Equations and Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note that statement (i) of Corollary 3.3 holds, but that statements (ii) and (iii) do not. More generally, for arbitrary g : R + → R + , whenever y * > 0 is such that 21) in particular meaning that the estimates in both (ii) and (iii) do not hold, then x * := (I − A) −1 Bg(y * ) is a non-zero equilibrium of (3.18) and the zero equilibrium of (3.18) cannot then be globally asymptotically or exponentially stable. The papers [49,64] consider attractivity and stability properties of the non-zero equilibrium x * when m = p = 1 and under conditions on A, B, C and g which ensure that y * > 0 in (3.21) is unique.…”
Section: Lur'e Difference Equations and Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to numerous important examples, control of positive systems is motivated by the challenges which nonnegativity constraints place, since subtraction is not always well-defined in positive cones, for instance. As such, the following fundamental facets of linear control theory all require different treatments for positive systems: reachability and controllability [15,16], observability [17], realisability [18,19] and stabilisability [20,21]. However, the additional structure afforded by positivity is often intuitive, mathematically helpful and thus simplifies matters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…k 2 + λk 1 ε where λ := max x∈C,|ϑ|x=1,K(x,ϑ)≥0 λ(x, ϑ) and λ(x, ϑ) refers to (15). By continuity, for ε sufficiently small there exists k 3 > 0 such that…”
Section: Geometric Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under mild conditions, the ray λv ∈ K given by the Perron-Frobenius eigenvector v ∈ K is an attractor for the system dynamics, [2], [3]. This fundamental property is exploited in a number of applications [5], [12], [15], [14] Differential positivity extends linear positivity to the nonlinear setting. A nonlinear system is differentially positive if its linearization along trajectories makes a cone (field) invariant [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%