2023
DOI: 10.3934/math.2023719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Necessary and sufficient conditions for boundedness of commutators of maximal function on the $ p $-adic vector spaces

Abstract: <abstract><p>In this paper, we first show that the $ p $-adic version of maximal function $ \mathcal{M}_{L\log L}^{p} $ is equivalent to the maximal function $ \mathcal{M}^{p}(\mathcal{M}^{p}) $ and that the class of functions for which the maximal commutators and the commutator with the $ p $-adic version of maximal function or the maximal sharp function are bounded on the $ p $-adic vector spaces are characterized and proved to be the same. Moreover, new pointwise estimates for these operators ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [10], the equivalence of M p (M p ) and M p L log L is given by the following which is very analogous to Euclidean setting. Lemma 2.3 Let f be a locally integrable function on Q n p .…”
Section: Auxiliary Propositions and Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [10], the equivalence of M p (M p ) and M p L log L is given by the following which is very analogous to Euclidean setting. Lemma 2.3 Let f be a locally integrable function on Q n p .…”
Section: Auxiliary Propositions and Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to estimate I, from the proof of the formula (2.5) in [10], we see that for any g with supp g ⊂ B γ (x)…”
Section: Auxiliary Propositions and Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11], the size of M p (M p ) is given by the following which is similar to Euclidean setting. Lemma 2.3 Let f be a locally integrable function on Q n p .…”
Section: Auxiliary Propositions and Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to estimate I, from the proof of the formula (2.5) in [11], we see that for any g with supp g ⊂ B γ (x)…”
Section: Auxiliary Propositions and Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%