2021
DOI: 10.1002/mma.7498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nečas–Lions lemma revisited: An Lp‐version of the generalized Korn inequality for incompatible tensor fields

Abstract: For 1 < p < ∞, we prove an Lp‐version of the generalized Korn inequality for incompatible tensor fields P in W01,0.1empfalse(Curl;normalΩ,ℝ3×3false). More precisely, let normalΩ⊂ℝ3 be a bounded Lipschitz domain. Then there exists a constant c = c(p, Ω) > 0 such that ‖P‖Lp(Ω,ℝ3×3)≤c‖symP‖Lp(Ω,ℝ3×3)+‖CurlP‖Lp(Ω,ℝ3×3) holds for all tensor fields P∈W01,0.1empfalse(Curl;normalΩ,ℝ3×3false), that is, for all P∈W1,0.1empfalse(Curl;normalΩ,ℝ3×3false) with vanishing tangential trace P×ν=0 on ∂Ω where ν denotes th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(144 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lauteri and Luckhaus [7] obtained the rigidity estimate (1.3) in the Lorentz space L 1 * ,∞ . In [10] we have already established the corresponding results in the L p -setting. Here, we focus on the trace-free case showing that the symmetric part can even be replaced by the symmetric deviatoric part.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lauteri and Luckhaus [7] obtained the rigidity estimate (1.3) in the Lorentz space L 1 * ,∞ . In [10] we have already established the corresponding results in the L p -setting. Here, we focus on the trace-free case showing that the symmetric part can even be replaced by the symmetric deviatoric part.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…where ν stands for the outward unit normal vector field and {τ l } l=1,...,n−1 denotes a moving tangent frame on ∂Ω, cf. [10]. Here, the generalized tangential trace P × n ν is understood in the sense of W − 1 p , p (∂Ω, R n× n(n−1)…”
Section: Function Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such inequalities have been considered and studied extensively by Neff and coauthors, cf. [20,21,24,25]; one form thereof is given by…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is equivalent to A inducing an elliptic operator A of the form (1.5), see the discussion at the end of Section 2.1. By smooth approximation, this gives us back the corresponding inequalities considered in [20,21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%