2010
DOI: 10.1029/2009jc005758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nearshore wave height variation in unsaturated surf

Abstract: [1] The nearshore evolution of wave height is presented from field observations during unsaturated surf conditions from 10 different beaches characterized by microtidal conditions and predominantly swell-dominated wave climates. Wave evolution is presented in terms of wave height to water depth ratio (g) for comparison with previous data from saturated surf. Both conventional time-averaged (g rms ) and a new wave-bywave analysis (g w ) are performed. Values of g increase with increasing offshore wave height, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
10
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the results presented in section are novel in the literature and show that Q b is highly variable at all locations analyzed in the present work which covered ranges of 0.1< γ <2. Such observations are in agreement with previous studies of the cross‐shore structure of other surf zone parameters, such as γ and H (Martins et al, ; Power et al, , ) and the instantaneous wave speed ( c ) (Postacchini & Brocchini, ; Tissier et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the results presented in section are novel in the literature and show that Q b is highly variable at all locations analyzed in the present work which covered ranges of 0.1< γ <2. Such observations are in agreement with previous studies of the cross‐shore structure of other surf zone parameters, such as γ and H (Martins et al, ; Power et al, , ) and the instantaneous wave speed ( c ) (Postacchini & Brocchini, ; Tissier et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Note that Q b values at the surf-swash boundary could be even lower if the wave height threshold value used to separate individual waves was lower (see section 3.2.1) as small wavelets being detect as unbroken waves would cause Q b to decrease. Finally, where it was captured in the data, the outer limit of the surf zone was observed to be in the range 1 < h∕H m 0∞ < 2 (0.5 < < 1) instead of the value of 2 < h∕H m 0∞ < 3 (0.3 < < 0.5) suggested by several other publications (Power et al, 2010;Ruessink et al, 1998;Thornton & Guza, 1982, 1983.…”
Section: Results Of Field Observationsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Using zero crossing analysis in the inner surf and swash causes some problems because the water level varies a lot in this zone, and the method is very sensitive to the definition of the mean water level around which the zero crossings are defined. Power et al (2010) have demonstrated how the use of zero crossing analysis can lead to misinterpretation of wave heights and the shape of the waves. When using the steepness criterion however, it is possible to exclude undulations on the water surface which are caused by turbulence while still identifying all the bores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption of the constant value of γ b across the surf zone has been questioned by several authors (Raubenheimer et al, 1996;Power et al, 2010). On the one hand, there is some evidence that it probably increases shoreward (Raubenheimer et al, 2001;Yemm, 2004).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Wave Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local (national) wind data sets are only reliable in the vicinity of each country (Räämet et al, 2009), and high-resolution modelled winds, optionally coupled with wind sea properties, suffer from being substantially inhomogeneous over time (Tuomi et al, 2012). Furthermore, the Gulf of Finland has a specific wind and wave regime (Pettersson et al, 2010;Soomere et al, 2008b) mainly because the strongest winds blow obliquely across this water body with respect to the topography. The biggest problem in the reconstruction of wave set-up is the mismatch in the direction of even the best modelled versions of wind fields compared with high-quality measured data (Keevallik and Soomere, 2010).…”
Section: T Soomere Et Al: Mapping Wave Set-up Near a Complex Geometmentioning
confidence: 99%