1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf00571192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nearshore fringing reefs in north Queensland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence of onshore migrations of coral in response to past changes in sea level rise is well documented in the geologic record (e.g. Hopley et al, 1983;Neumann and Macintyre, 1985). However, evidence for co-location of live corals and mangroves is not.…”
Section: Alternative Refuges and Resiliency Factorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Evidence of onshore migrations of coral in response to past changes in sea level rise is well documented in the geologic record (e.g. Hopley et al, 1983;Neumann and Macintyre, 1985). However, evidence for co-location of live corals and mangroves is not.…”
Section: Alternative Refuges and Resiliency Factorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, the relatively exposed location of SI-N may mean this reef is more subjected to higher frequency disturbances and higher export rates, which would result in lower net reef accretion rates. The "up and out" mode of reef growth displayed in the reef chronostratigraphy at SI-N is typical of inshore fringing reefs in island embayment settings, such as Pioneer Bay at Orpheus Island, central GBR (Hopley et al 1983). …”
Section: Accepted M Manuscript 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the ~400 m long sand spit indicates a large supply of sediment to this part of the island. The sand spit would be mobile under normal and storm conditions and spit migration may also influence the survival of coral recruits in this area of the reef flat (Hopley et al 1983). …”
Section: -1995mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequent to these studies, the results of the cross sectional drillings have been reported on the Great Bar rier Reef (e. g. Davies and Marshall, 1980;Mar shall and Davies, 1982;Davies and Hopley, 1983;Hopley et al, 1983;Hopley and Barnes, 1985), Caribbean (e. g. Macintyre et al, 1981Macintyre et al, , 1985, Florida (e. g. Shinn et al, 1977), Eastern Pacific (e. g. Glynn and Macintyre, 1977), French Polynesia (e. g. Montaggioni, 1988), Japan (e. g. Konishi et al, 1983;Takahashi et al, 1988). Hubbard (1985) reconstructed the accretion patterns of the Holocene reef proposed by Kinsey (1981) which ascribed the Pacific and Atlantic controversy, into Type I (detritus remains within the reef complex) and Type II (the sediment not incorporated as backfill) by taking into account drilling results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%