2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2007.04.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nearest-neighbour spacing distributions of the β-Hermite ensemble of random matrices

Abstract: The evolution with β of the distributions of the spacing 's' between nearest-neighbor levels of unfolded spectra of random matrices from the β-Hermite ensemble (β-HE) is investigated by Monte Carlo simulations. The random matrices from the β-HE are real-symmetric and tridiagonal where β , which can take any positive value, is the reciprocal of the temperature in the classical electrostatic

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(92 reference statements)
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is clear that gamma distributions do not precisely model the analytic systems discussed here, and do not give correct asymptotic behaviour at the origin, as is evident from the results of Caër et al [11] who obtained excellent approximations for GOE, GUE and GSE distributions using the generalized gamma distribution (1.2) . The differences may be seen in Figure 3 which shows the unit mean distributions for gamma (dashed) and generalized gamma [11] (solid) fits to the true variances for the Poisson, GOE, GUE and GSE ensembles. Table 2: Effect of sample size: Statistical data for spacings in ten blocks of increasing size 200, 000m, m = 1, 2, .…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is clear that gamma distributions do not precisely model the analytic systems discussed here, and do not give correct asymptotic behaviour at the origin, as is evident from the results of Caër et al [11] who obtained excellent approximations for GOE, GUE and GSE distributions using the generalized gamma distribution (1.2) . The differences may be seen in Figure 3 which shows the unit mean distributions for gamma (dashed) and generalized gamma [11] (solid) fits to the true variances for the Poisson, GOE, GUE and GSE ensembles. Table 2: Effect of sample size: Statistical data for spacings in ten blocks of increasing size 200, 000m, m = 1, 2, .…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Then the best fits of (1.2) had the parameter values [11] and were accurate to within ∼ 0.1% of the true distributions from Forrester [15]. Observe that the exponential distribution is recovered by the choice g(s; 0, 1) = e −s .…”
Section: Gsementioning
confidence: 84%
“…For β ∈ R + \ {1, 2, 4} no such precise numerical schemes for the evaluation of p β are available. Instead, we use the generalised Wigner surmise (see [22]), which is only an approximation to the limiting distribution. One Looking at (40) one notes that the numerics will not detect the replacement of s −∞ dµ β by an approximation s −∞ dμ β as long as their deviation is small compared to E N .…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 4.9. We note that for the results presented in section 5.1 it is not necessary to keep track of the k-dependence of the error in (22). However, this estimate is needed in the proof of Theorem 6.2.…”
Section: Universality Of the K-point Correlation Functions For Invarimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw level spacing has already been computed in the context of a 2 × 2 β-Hermite ensemble in (40).…”
Section: Spectral Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%