2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18160.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nearby supernova rates from the Lick Observatory Supernova Search - II. The observed luminosity functions and fractions of supernovae in a complete sample

Abstract: This is the second paper of a series in which we present new measurements of the observed rates of supernovae (SNe) in the local Universe, determined from the Lick Observatory Supernova Search (LOSS). In this paper, a complete SN sample is constructed, and the observed (uncorrected for host-galaxy extinction) luminosity functions (LFs) of SNe are derived. These LFs solve two issues that have plagued previous rate calculations for nearby SNe: the luminosity distribution of SNe and the host-galaxy extinction. We… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

45
697
8
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 721 publications
(753 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(167 reference statements)
45
697
8
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Almost no difference arises between the results of the calibrated models SAGS and SAGTH5B2. The observed rates show a dichotomy at low redshift; while the works of Botticella et al (2012) and Mattila et al (2012) estimate SNe CC rates of almost 2 (10 −4 ) yr −1 Mpc −3 h 3 70 , the works of Cappellaro et al (1999) and Li et al (2011) give SNe CC rates of the order of 0.6 (10 −4 ) yr −1 Mpc −3 h 3 70 . The model outputs are consistent with the higher values of SNe CC rates at z = 0.…”
Section: Sne Delay Timesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Almost no difference arises between the results of the calibrated models SAGS and SAGTH5B2. The observed rates show a dichotomy at low redshift; while the works of Botticella et al (2012) and Mattila et al (2012) estimate SNe CC rates of almost 2 (10 −4 ) yr −1 Mpc −3 h 3 70 , the works of Cappellaro et al (1999) and Li et al (2011) give SNe CC rates of the order of 0.6 (10 −4 ) yr −1 Mpc −3 h 3 70 . The model outputs are consistent with the higher values of SNe CC rates at z = 0.…”
Section: Sne Delay Timesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, single-degenerate models have been ruled out for the supernova remnant SNR 0509-67 by the lack of an excompanion star (Schaefer & Pagnotta 2012), and pre-explosion X-ray and optical data for SN2007on are compatible with a single-degenerate model (Voss & Nelemans 2008). Multiple progenitor channels would help to explain the observed variability within the type Ia category (Li et al 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Type II-P events are the most common among CCSNe (Smartt et al 2009)and constitute almost 30% of CCSNe in an ideal magnitude-limited sample (Li et al 2011, their Figure 11). Typically, SNeII-P display a plateau in their light curve for ∼100 days , with an absolute magnitude of M R ≈−16.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%