2018
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1719695115
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States

Abstract: SignificanceCarbon dioxide removal through the permanent sequestration of biogenic CO2 is a critical technique for climate change mitigation, but most bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technologies are technically immature or commercially unavailable. In contrast, examples of CCS of biogenic CO2 resulting from fermentation emissions already exist at scale. Here, we evaluate low-cost, commercially ready sequestration opportunities for existing biorefineries in the United States. We find that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
106
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The deformations may be sufficient to induce seismicity (Gan & Frohlich, 2013;Hincks et al, 2018;Zoback & Gorelick, 2012) or observable uplift or subsidence of the ground (Rutqvist, 2012;Shirzaei et al, 2016). CO 2 sequestration into underground geological reservoirs is considered as a near-term solution to global warming effects (Benson et al, 2005;Celia, 2017;Sanchez et al, 2018). CO 2 injected into rocks can be retained by capillary, solubility, structure, and mineral trapping mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deformations may be sufficient to induce seismicity (Gan & Frohlich, 2013;Hincks et al, 2018;Zoback & Gorelick, 2012) or observable uplift or subsidence of the ground (Rutqvist, 2012;Shirzaei et al, 2016). CO 2 sequestration into underground geological reservoirs is considered as a near-term solution to global warming effects (Benson et al, 2005;Celia, 2017;Sanchez et al, 2018). CO 2 injected into rocks can be retained by capillary, solubility, structure, and mineral trapping mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EU for example, has promoted a funding programme to support the advances and application of such new technologies (ec.europa.eu, 2018a). The indications are from the data that professional individuals in the community want to develop and use CO 2 sequestration -not just recycle their waste -leading to a CO 2 sequestration credit (Sanchez et al, 2018) in order to offset CO 2 emissions. However, the question of how to engage the ordinary user within a polluted environment using social norms (Huber, Viscussi, & Bell, 2018) as CCS is not as yet, very well understood (Braun et al, 2018), and differs very little from its 2004 position (Shackley, McLachlan, & Gough, 2004).…”
Section: Technical Development and Underground Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include tax credits for carbon sequestration (Section 45Q), the federal Renewable Fuels Standard, agriculture policies set in the Farm Bill, and research, development and demonstration (RD&D) programs for agriculture and energy projects. For instance, operators of biorefineries and anaerobic digesters that capture and sequester their CO 2 emissions can qualify both for federal tax credits and the LCFS, should they sell their low-carbon fuels in California (Sanchez, Johnson, et al 2018).…”
Section: Ecological Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%