2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(00)00090-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-surface reduction of cavity ring-down spectroscopy detection sensitivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase near the sample surface can be observed, which is explained by the solid surface geometrical obstruc tion of the cavity ringdown beam and by the diffraction effects [50]. The near sample surface effects are diminished if instead of maximum of the absorption lines, an integrated intensity (gray area in figure 6 and an integral part of the equa tion (1)) is used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An increase near the sample surface can be observed, which is explained by the solid surface geometrical obstruc tion of the cavity ringdown beam and by the diffraction effects [50]. The near sample surface effects are diminished if instead of maximum of the absorption lines, an integrated intensity (gray area in figure 6 and an integral part of the equa tion (1)) is used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By eliminating rays that fall outside the aperture of any optic, this method properly accounts for rays that constitute bad injections (e.g., rays that strike the main cavity walls) or that do not strike the detector. Although this calculation is incomplete in that it does not include diffraction effects (which are important when beams fall near to the main cavity walls 39 ), it provides a quantitatively and qualitatively accurate prediction of the re-injection efficiency.…”
Section: Simulation Of Re-injection Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In applying CRDS to nanoliter-volume systems, it is necessary to focus the beam through an aperture that is generally <100 μm. To avoid diffraction losses and, thus, a reduction in the ring-down time constant, the Gaussian beam waist should be at least 4.6 times smaller than the aperture, a condition discussed by Siegman and verified experimentally by Zhao et al Such a tightly focused beam in a stable resonator is difficult to achieve because confocal or near-confocal geometry is required. The application of CRDS to nanoliter-volume systems is an area of interest because detection limits for these low-volume techniques are comparatively quite high, owing to the short path length of capillaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%