2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021gl093542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near Surface Properties of Martian Regolith Derived From InSight HP3‐RAD Temperature Observations During Phobos Transits

Abstract: The Martian surface temperature response to Phobos transits at the InSight landing site is interpreted• The thermal conductivity or density of the top 0.2 to 4 mm is significantly less than that of the top 4 cm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(112 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar estimates for soil thermal conductivity were acquired via RAD observations during Phobos transits across the sun (Mueller et al., 2021) and through near‐surface active heating experiments performed by the HP 3 mole's TEM‐A sensors (Grott et al., 2021; Spohn et al., 2018). Thermal conductivity measurements from HP 3 , from depths ≤37 cm, indicate a low soil thermal conductivity of 0.039 ± 0.001 W m −1 K −1 and a low soil density of ∼1,095 kg m −3 .…”
Section: Review Of Post‐landing In‐situ Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar estimates for soil thermal conductivity were acquired via RAD observations during Phobos transits across the sun (Mueller et al., 2021) and through near‐surface active heating experiments performed by the HP 3 mole's TEM‐A sensors (Grott et al., 2021; Spohn et al., 2018). Thermal conductivity measurements from HP 3 , from depths ≤37 cm, indicate a low soil thermal conductivity of 0.039 ± 0.001 W m −1 K −1 and a low soil density of ∼1,095 kg m −3 .…”
Section: Review Of Post‐landing In‐situ Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, the local geology provides critical context for interpreting the results from the instruments. Understanding the local stratigraphy has implications for shallow seismic velocity measurements from SEIS (Kedar et al., 2017; Lognonné et al., 2020; Murdoch et al., 2021), models and observations of seismic signals from nearby crater impacts (Daubar et al., 2020), thermal conductivity and soil porosity estimates from HP 3 (Grott et al., 2021), and thermal inertia and conductivity measurements from the onboard Radiometer (RAD) (Mueller et al., 2021; Piqueux et al., 2021). Multiple pre‐landing and post‐landing geological investigations characterized the landing site by providing geomorphologic observations of local landforms (Golombek et al., 2017, 2018; Golombek, Warner, et al., 2020; Grant et al., 2020; Sweeney et al., 2018; Warner, Golombek, et al., 2017; Warner, Grant, et al., 2020), stratigraphic and sedimentological characteristics of the regolith and lava plains (Grant et al., 2020, 2022; Pan et al., 2020; Warner, Golombek, et al., 2017; Weitz et al., 2020), measurements of the local and regional rock size distributions (Golombek et al., 2017, 2021), observations of active surface processes (e.g., eolian processes) (Baker et al., 2021; Charalambous et al., 2021), and comparisons to other landing sites (Golombek, Kass, et al., 2020; Warner, Schuyler, et al., 2020; Weitz et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8). HP 3 radiometer measurements of the surface (Mueller et al 2021) yield a thermal inertia dominated by sand and not affected by rocks (Golombek et al 2020a;Piqueux et al 2021;Grott et al 2021). Stereo panoramas enable measurements of rock size and shape that indicate an impact origin for the hollow that was degraded and mostly filled by mass wasting and aeolian activity that transported sand from ejecta into the crater Grant et al 2020Grant et al , 2022Weitz et al 2020).…”
Section: Geology Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2019). These are ρ = 1,007 kg m −3 and ρ = 1,211 kg m −3 , where the latter corresponds to an estimate that includes the additional constraint posed by the surface thermal inertia as derived from HP 3 radiometer measurements (N. T. Mueller et al., 2020; N. Mueller et al., 2021). For the soil specific heat capacity, a value of 630 J kg −1 K −1 has been assumed (Morgan et al., 2018).…”
Section: Probe Emplacement Data Acquisition and Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the soil density was not known a priori, we ran two different sets of inversions using the two median densities derived for the InSight landing site by Grott et al (2019). These are ρ = 1,007 kg m −3 and ρ = 1,211 kg m −3 , where the latter corresponds to an estimate that includes the additional constraint posed by the surface thermal inertia as derived from HP 3 radiometer measurements (N. T. Mueller et al, 2020;N. Mueller et al, 2021).…”
Section: Probe Emplacement Data Acquisition and Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%