1999
DOI: 10.1002/qj.49712555916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near‐surface fluxes of cloud water evolve vertically

Abstract: Occult deposition to vegetation, via mechanical interception of wind-blown cloud water, can be a significant fraction of total ionic chemical deposition for some forests. Applying micrometeorological methods to the estimation of cloud water deposition requires particular consideration since cloud droplets are not conservative but are subject to material change (phase change); sedimentation also affects fluxes of droplets. The budget equation for liquid water (LW) in orographic cloud predicts that LW fluxes wil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kowalski and Vong 1999;Holwerda et al 2006). The eddy covariance method only measures net deposition whereas at the leaf level the gross deposition rate is considerably larger.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kowalski and Vong 1999;Holwerda et al 2006). The eddy covariance method only measures net deposition whereas at the leaf level the gross deposition rate is considerably larger.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There, the rate of potential PAR is high and accessibility to moisture from passing mists is highest due to the diffusion of flow within the canopy (Kowalski and Vong, 1999), which may be exacerbated in the present context due to the outer canopy thickening with high epiphytic growth (Chapter 4). Thus, inside the canopy, establishing epiphytes would be significantly disadvantaged by the lower PAR, lower accessibility to moisture from passing mists (though less evaporation), and a larger metabolic expenditure for root growth in order to secure an attachment on the larger surface area.…”
Section: Inner Canopy Recolonisationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One way of addressing the isoaxial sampling is to put the instrument onto a turntable and letting it continually turn into the main wind direction as done by Vong (1995), Kowalski et al (1997), Kowalski (1999), Wrzesinsky (2000), Burkard et al (2002), Thalmann (2002, Burkard (2003), Eugster et al (2006), andHolwerda et al (2006). Nevertheless, these procedures do not assure isokinetic sampling conditions.…”
Section: Sampling Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%