Near peer teaching in medical curricula: integrating student teachers in pathology tutorials

Abstract

IntroductionDue to increased cognitive and social congruence with their tutees, near peer teachers (NPTs) may be capable of more effectively delivering course material. This study examines NPTs as pathology tutors alongside more traditional teachers (e.g., consultants and registrars) to explore their acceptability, effectiveness, and years of ‘distance’ between tutors and tutees.MethodIn total, 240 first- and second-year undergraduate medical students were taught set material in a pathology tutorial setting by NPTs (fourth-year medical students), registrars, or consultants. Learners were then asked to provide feedback using a 15-item, Likert-type scale.ResultsOn 11 of the 15 items, there were no significant differences in students’ median ratings. However, NPTs were perceived to be significantly more approachable than consultants, more aware of learning outcomes, more receptive to student input, and more invested in exam success. Compared with second-year students, first-year students showed a preference towards registrar tutors in terms of perceived gain of knowledge and use of time. In contrast, second-year students showed a preference towards NPTs, who provided more perceived knowledge gain and investment in exam success. No significant differences were found regarding consultant tutors.DiscussionPerhaps due to increased congruence with tutees, NPTs show promise as tutors within medical curricula. This provides advantages not only to tutees, but also to tutors – who may gain vital teaching experience and offer an effective supplement to ‘traditional’ faculty educators.

The Efficacy of Frontline Near‐Peer Teaching in a Modern Medical Curriculum

“…One possible explanation is that the social and cognitive congruence existing between the learner and NPT is perceived to be more important for learning than academic pedigree. A previous study by Tayler et al suggests that the desire for a qualified educator varies according to the level of training (Tayler et al, ). In their study, first year medical students were more likely to want a qualified clinical tutor as opposed to a NPT, however, this opinion was reversed in the second year.…”

Near-peer medical student simulation training

“…A near peer can be defined as a learner who is 1 year or more senior to another learner undertaking the same training . This has led to many medical schools formally endorsing near‐peer teaching into their undergraduate curricula . To the best of our knowledge, no studies have explored near‐peer simulation training in the context of the assessment and management of acutely unwell patients.…”

Informal Peer-Assisted Learning Groups Did Not Lead to Better Performance of Saudi Dental Students

“…Studies have shown that PAL had positively perceived and actual effects on learning when the groups are instructor-formed and supervised, whether they are nursing [10] or medical students [11,12] . The outcomes of instructor-formed student groups did not significantly differ from those taught by teaching staff [13] , and students considered their peers to be more important to success in examination than experts [14] .…”