1975
DOI: 10.1137/0204023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-Optimal Solutions to a 2-Dimensional Placement Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. The resulting shapes appear to approximate some "ideal" rounded shape, with better and better approximation for growing k. Karp et al [13] and Bender et al [4] study the exact nature of this shape, shown in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Related Algorithmic Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…2. The resulting shapes appear to approximate some "ideal" rounded shape, with better and better approximation for growing k. Karp et al [13] and Bender et al [4] study the exact nature of this shape, shown in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Related Algorithmic Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is considered in [9] for the scenario of all processors being of the same size; even without existing modules and uniform routing cost, this turns out to be a tough problem, as noted in [8]. We hope to provide results on this scenario for modules of differing size and non-uniform routing cost in the near future.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the case of a city, a particularly appropriate metric is the Manhattan distance, which is the sum of the east-west distance along streets and the north-south distance along avenues. It is interesting that while the optimal shape of a city is not circular, it is extremely close to circular [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper generalizes two earlier studies. Karp, McKellar, and Wong [8] consider the two special extreme cases p = 1 and p = ∞. For these cases, they determine a differential equation that describes the boundary of the optimal region that minimizes the average distance between all points in the region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%