2007
DOI: 10.2514/1.26024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-Optimal Missile Avoidance Trajectories via Receding Horizon Control

Abstract: This paper introduces a receding horizon control scheme for obtaining near-optimal controls in a feedback form for an aircraft trying to avoid a closing air-to-air missile. The vehicles are modeled as point masses. Rotation kinematics of the aircraft are taken into account by limiting the pitch and roll rates as well as the angular accelerations of the angle of attack and the bank angle. The missile uses proportional navigation and it has a boostsustain propulsion system. In the proposed scheme, the optimal co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a oneon-one engagement, and supposing one has achieved an advantageous position to another and has caught the enemy in his lethal cone, he has to employ his missiles most effectively. Many studies have appeared about optimal missile avoidance by an aircraft [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], however, only a few papers have treated avoiding multiple missiles [12,18]. The reason for this could be that it is difficult for an aircraft to avoid even one missile, therefore avoiding two missiles is not realistic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a oneon-one engagement, and supposing one has achieved an advantageous position to another and has caught the enemy in his lethal cone, he has to employ his missiles most effectively. Many studies have appeared about optimal missile avoidance by an aircraft [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], however, only a few papers have treated avoiding multiple missiles [12,18]. The reason for this could be that it is difficult for an aircraft to avoid even one missile, therefore avoiding two missiles is not realistic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 19. Vehicle trajectories and aircraft control history by using type 3 maneuver for r 12 of 250 m (with trajectory shaping).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is constructed as a worst-case no-escape envelope. In [8], the no-escape firingenvelope concept, which was developed originally for offensive purposes, was used to analyze near-optimal missile avoidance trajectories. The analysis included defensive envelope construction, with respect to a missile that is about to be launched, for different performance measures (e.g., capture time, closing velocity, miss distance, and control effort).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial value of velocity, flight path and heading angle are determined applying the result of equation (10) in equation (9).…”
Section: Initializationmentioning
confidence: 99%