2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2010.5502029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-Optimal and Efficient Heuristic Algorithms for Resource Allocation in MISO-OFDM Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate or power constraints might be violated whenever the algorithm stops because the number of iterations has been reached before the convergence rule is met. In this subsection, we propose a simple procedure to obtain a feasible point to problem (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) from the dual solution found with Algorithm 1. This point is not optimal but because we start from the dual optimal solution, we expect that it will be close to the optimal solution.…”
Section: Dual-based Primal Feasible Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The rate or power constraints might be violated whenever the algorithm stops because the number of iterations has been reached before the convergence rule is met. In this subsection, we propose a simple procedure to obtain a feasible point to problem (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) from the dual solution found with Algorithm 1. This point is not optimal but because we start from the dual optimal solution, we expect that it will be close to the optimal solution.…”
Section: Dual-based Primal Feasible Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraint (12) guarantees that we do not choose more than M users for each subcarrier, constraint (13) guarantees that if we have chosen two users k and j, they meet the ZF constraints and is redundant for other users, and constraint (14) guarantees that the beamforming vector is zero for users that are not chosen. Problem (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) is a non-linear mixed integer program (MIP) and these are known to be very hard to solve exactly. In this paper, whenever we need to get an exact solution, we use a complete enumeration of the binary variables α satisfying the constraints (12).…”
Section: Zero-forcing Beamformingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This results to the adjacent channel interference and thus reduced the power of nth subcarrier for guaranteeing to be lower than Q. Hence, to account for such adverse effects but in a more simple form other than the optimization perspective, we define new or effective channel gain for the kth user at the nth subcarrier as S ′ k,n = g k,n g k,n+1 +g k,n−1 , which is then used for the subcarrier allocation similar to S. Like previous works, 41 it is expected that the results and achievable rates of such optimization-directed heuristic subcarrier allocation do not significantly differ from those of the actual proposed optimization scheme because of the reasonable selected metric (S ′ k,n ).…”
Section: Subcarrier Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intelligent algorithms have attracted more and more scholars' attention to solve optimisation problems (Mo et al, 2011;Gu et al, 2013). In the studies of OFDM resource allocation, a lot of reports make use of intelligent algorithm to solve the OFDM resource allocation model (Perea-Vega et al, 2010;Odhah et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2012b;Ahmed and Majumder, 2012). Sadeque et al (2011) and Annauth and Rughooputh (2011) use intelligent algorithm to allocate power to each sub-carrier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%