1990
DOI: 10.4141/cjps90-008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-Infrared Reflectance Estimates of Grain Protein and Malt Extract in Hill and Row Plot Evaluations of Spring Malting Barley

Abstract: TRAGooNRUNG, S., HAvES

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(5 reference statements)
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This peak has been assigned a -SH combination. This agreed with work of Tragoonrung et al 34 in a filter calibration.…”
Section: Vsximr 7tigxvesupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This peak has been assigned a -SH combination. This agreed with work of Tragoonrung et al 34 in a filter calibration.…”
Section: Vsximr 7tigxvesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The region from 2176 nm to 2186 nm had been assigned to protein. Starr 33 and Tragoonrung et al 34 also selected a filter wavelength at 2180 nm for barley protein.…”
Section: )79087 %2( (-7'977-32mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model major parameters R 2 and RPD reflect acceptable for most applications and screening purposes. Results from this study was comparable and much better than that of previous researchers who developed promising calibrations for predicting the extract of whole grain (R 2 c =0.78 -0.85) [16] and ground barley (R 2 c = 0.77 -0.96) [17]. Because this property is highly influenced by the malting process since enzyme activity during malting influences the malt extract which limits the accuracy of any NIR prediction based on not malted barley.…”
Section: Extract Content Modelsupporting
confidence: 71%