2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112008001444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-field flow structure of a confined wall jet on flat and concave rough walls

Abstract: Experimental results are presented of the mean flow and turbulence characteristics in the near field of a plane wall jet issuing from a nozzle onto flat and concave walls consisting of fixed sand beds. This is a flow configuration of interest for sediment erosion, also referred to as scouring. The measurements were made with an acoustic profiler that gives access to the three components of the instantaneous velocities. For the flat-wall flow, it is shown that the outer-layer spatial growth rate and the maxima … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He reported the formation of Görtler instabilities in the outer part of the velocity profile (at the interface and above) where the density stratification is weak, which modify vertical mixing and the vertical turbulent transport. Albayrak, Hopfinger & Lemmin (2008) studied a wall jet on a concave boundary and reported significant changes in the boundary layer characteristics when Görtler instabilities were present. We performed cross-stream slit lighting and dye injections at the boundary but could not detect any Görtler vortices near the boundary for the parameter range investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He reported the formation of Görtler instabilities in the outer part of the velocity profile (at the interface and above) where the density stratification is weak, which modify vertical mixing and the vertical turbulent transport. Albayrak, Hopfinger & Lemmin (2008) studied a wall jet on a concave boundary and reported significant changes in the boundary layer characteristics when Görtler instabilities were present. We performed cross-stream slit lighting and dye injections at the boundary but could not detect any Görtler vortices near the boundary for the parameter range investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Görtler vortices have been rarely and/or hardly identified in geophysical flows, such as boundary layer flow around a hill [Tani, 1962;Finnigan, 1983;Kaimal and Finnigan, 1994], gravity or stratified flows along a surface [Bradshaw, 1969;Scotti, 2008], and channel and tidal flows with sediment erosion [Hopfinger et al, 2004;Albayrak et al, 2008]. The present results bring a few ideas of how to track Görtler instability for in situ flow configurations.…”
Section: Toward In Situ Evidence Of Görtler Vortices?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For environmental fluid configurations, it is well known that Görtler instability exists in the nature and is strongly related to orographic and streamline curvature and wind shear [Bradshaw, 1969;Finnigan, 1983;Kaimal and Finnigan, 1994;Hopfinger et al, 2004;Albayrak et al, 2008;Scotti, 2008]. Many laboratory experiments have been designed to analyze precisely the effect of both concave and convex slopes on turbulent boundary layer development [Tani, 1962;Hoffmann et al, 1985;Muck et al, 1985;Swearingen and Blackwelder, 1987].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a boundary is artificially roughened by particles of a given diameter, then the bed roughness, k e , which is the length scale of protrusions into the flow, is simply proportional to the particle diameter. Albayraki et al [12] considered uniformly graded sand of mean diameter d 50 ¼ 2 mm that is equal to the roughness length k e used in the theoretical analysis. Strictly this eddy viscosity is given by s $ u s k e , where u s is the friction velocity, and Hogg et al [2] implies s $ U 0 k e over a rough wall.…”
Section: Analysis Of Turbulent Wall Jet Over Transitional Rough Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%