2010
DOI: 10.1364/ao.49.002190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-field diffraction of gratings with surface defects

Abstract: Diffraction gratings produce self-images in the near field. Defects on the surface of the grating may occur due to the manufacturing process. These devices are often placed in dirty industrial environments. Dust particles or drops of liquid can be deposited over their surface. In this work, we analyze the effect of surface defects placed over the grating on the self-imaging process. We analytically show how the self-images gradually recover as we separate from the grating when one defect is present. Also a ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, due to the averaging process performed in equation (6), the variogram function is much smoother than the original intensity distribution. Influence of grating defects on the visibility of the fringes has been reported by the authors in previous works [23,24]. An example is shown in figure 4 where the variogram function has been obtained for two sections of figure 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In addition, due to the averaging process performed in equation (6), the variogram function is much smoother than the original intensity distribution. Influence of grating defects on the visibility of the fringes has been reported by the authors in previous works [23,24]. An example is shown in figure 4 where the variogram function has been obtained for two sections of figure 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…We also observed that a larger inter-grating distance and then a larger shear distance allows one to reduce the sensitivity of the device to the surface defects of the first grating [13]. However, the drawback of increasing shearing distance is observable by comparison of the four different curves: the higher spatial frequencies features disappear as one would expect, letting only the larger features of the mirror slope error for larger shear distance.…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The ability of the AP approach to deal with wideband signals allows it to cover a wider range of practically relevant situations. Among examples are nonlinear ultrasound imaging [4], [14], speech processing [20], [70], and complicated cases of optical interference/diffraction setups [73]. Moreover, it can also be of great use in time-critical imaging settings by providing high modulator estimation accuracy at low sampling rates of the signal (see, e.g., [72]).…”
Section: Extensions and Generalizations A Demodulation In Higher Dime...mentioning
confidence: 99%